You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/130511
Title: 
Effect of polymerization methods and thermal cycling on color stability of acrylic resin denture teeth
Author(s): 
Institution: 
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
ISSN: 
0022-3913
Sponsorship: 
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
Sponsorship Process Number: 
FAPESP: 2006/60850-4
Abstract: 
Statement of problem: Acrylic resin denture teeth are widely used due to the chemical bond to the acrylic resin of the denture base. However, discoloration of acrylic resin denture teeth can be a problem. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of polymerization methods and thermal cycling on the color change of acrylic resin denture teeth. Material and methods: Ten different brands of acrylic resin denture teeth were evaluated: Art Plus (AP), Biolux (BX), Biotone IPN (BI), Magister (MG), Mondial 6 (MD), Premium 6 (PR), SR Vivodent PE (SR), Trilux (TR), Trubyte Biotone (TB), and Vipi Dent Plus (VP). Each brand was divided into 2 groups (n=12); each group was subjected to 1 of 2 polymerization methods (microwave, 500 W for 3 minutes, or water bath, 74°C for 9 hours). After polymerization, all of the specimens were thermal cycled between 5°C and 55°C with 30-second dwell times for 5000 cycles. The specimen colors were measured with a spectrophotometer, using the CIE L*a*b* system, at baseline (B), after polymerization (P), and after thermal cycling (T). Color differences (ΔE) were calculated for periods between P and B (PB), T and B (TB), and T and P (TP). A ΔE of ≤3.3 was considered clinically acceptable. The data were evaluated by 3-way repeated-measures ANOVA and the Tukey HSD test (α=.05). Results: The highest ΔE values were obtained for BI and SR teeth; these were significantly higher than the values obtained for the other brands (P<.05). There was no significant difference between the 2 polymerization methods. There was no significant difference between TB and PB for either polymerization method. Conclusions: The ΔE values are within acceptable clinical limits for all brands, for both polymerization methods and different measurement periods. © 2009 The Editorial Council of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
Issue Date: 
1-Dec-2009
Citation: 
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 102, n. 6, p. 385-392, 2009.
Time Duration: 
385-392
Publisher: 
Mosby-elsevier
Keywords: 
  • Acrylic acid resin
  • Water
  • Color
  • Colorimetry
  • Dental care
  • Hardness
  • Heat
  • Materials testing
  • Microwave radiation
  • Phase transition
  • Prosthesis
  • Tooth prosthesis
  • Acrylic Resins
  • Color
  • Colorimetry
  • Dental Stress Analysis
  • Hardness
  • Hot Temperature
  • Materials Testing
  • Microwaves
  • Phase Transition
  • Prosthesis Coloring
  • Tooth, Artificial
  • Water
Source: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60200-6
URI: 
Access Rights: 
Acesso restrito
Type: 
outro
Source:
http://repositorio.unesp.br/handle/11449/130511
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.