You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Finite Element Stress Analysis of Edentulous Mandibles with Different Bone Types Supporting Multiple-Implant Superstructures
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
  • Dent Prosthesis Parana Fed Inst
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
Sponsorship Process Number: 
FAPESP: 08/00209 9
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of different types of bone on the stress distribution in the mandibular bone supporting a prefabricated bar type implant prosthesis using three dimensional finite element analysis Materials and Methods Four finite element models (M) of a completely edentulous mandibular arch were built The bone types varied from type I to type 4 (M1, M2, M3, M4) The arch was restored using a prefabricated bar system supported by four interforaminal implants for the protocol prosthesis Computer software was used to determine the stress fields Three unilateral posterior loads (L) of 150 N were exerted on the prosthesis L1, perpendicular to the prefabricated bar, L2, oblique (30 degrees) in the buccolingual direction, and L3, oblique (30 degrees) in the linguobuccal direction The maximum principal stress (sigma(max)) and the maximum principal strain (epsilon(max)) were obtained for cortical and trabecular bone Results Types 3 and 4 bone showed the highest sigma(max) (MPa) in the cortical bone (19 9 and 18 2 for L1, 34 6 and 31 3 for L2, and 3 88 and 24 4 for L3, respectively) The maximum principal strain (epsilon(max)) was observed in type 4 cortical bone for all loads (1 80 for L1, 2 4 for L2, and 2 36 for L3) Conclusions The cortical bone in M3 and M4 showed the highest stress concentration in the axial and buccolingual loading conditions Bone types 1 and 2 showed the lowest stress concentrations For the linguobuccal loading condition, the cortical bone in M4 showed the highest stress concentration, followed by bone types 3, 2, and 1 Cortical bone in M4 showed the highest strain for all loading conditions The bone type might not be the only decisive factor to influence the stress distribution the bone supporting an implant prosthesis anchored by a prefabricated bar INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS 2010,25 1108-1114
Issue Date: 
International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, v. 25, n. 6, p. 1108-1114, 2010.
Time Duration: 
Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
  • biomechanics
  • bone
  • dental implants
  • finite element analysis
  • osseointegration
Access Rights: 
Acesso restrito
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.