Você está no menu de acessibilidade

Utilize este identificador para citar ou criar um link para este item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/22814
Título: 
Machined and plastic copings in three-element prostheses with different types of implant-abutment joints: a strain gauge comparative analysis
Autor(es): 
Instituição: 
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
  • CETEC
ISSN: 
1678-7757
Financiador: 
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
Número do financiamento: 
FAPESP: 07/53293-4
Resumo: 
Objective: Using strain gauge (SG) analysis, the aim of this in vitro study was quantify the strain development during the fixation of three-unit screw implant-supported fixed partial dentures, varying the types of implant-abutment joints and the type of prosthetic coping. The hypotheses were that the type of hexagonal connection would generate different microstrains and the type of copings would produce similar microstrains after prosthetic screws had been tightened onto microunit abutments. Materials and methods: Three dental implants with external (EH) and internal (IH) hexagonal configuration were inserted into two polyurethane blocks. Microunit abutments were screwed onto their respective implant groups, applying a torque of 20 Ncm. Machined Co-Cr copings (M) and plastic prosthetic copings (P) were screwed onto the abutments, which received standard wax patterns. The wax patterns were cast in Co-Cr alloy (n=5), forming four groups: G1) EH/M; G2) EH/P; G3) IH/M and G4) IH/P. Four SGs were bonded onto the surface of the block tangentially to the implants, SG 1 mesially to implant 1, SG 2 and SG 3 mesially and distally to implant 2, respectively, and SG 4 distally to implant 3. The superstructure's occlusal screws were tightened onto microunit abutments with 10 Ncm torque using a manual torque driver. The magnitude of microstrain on each SG was recorded in units of microstrain (mu epsilon). The data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test (p<0.05). Results: Microstrain values of each group were: G1=338.1 +/- 223.0 mu epsilon; G2=363.9 +/- 190.9 mu epsilon; G3=415.1 +/- 53.5 mu epsilon; G4=363.9 +/- 190.9 mu epsilon. No statistically difference was found between EH and IH, regardless of the type of copings (p>0.05). The hypotheses were partially accepted. Conclusions: It was concluded that the type of hexagonal connection and coping presented similar mechanical behavior under tightening conditions.
Data de publicação: 
1-Mai-2010
Citação: 
Journal of Applied Oral Science. Bauru-sp: Univ São Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauru, v. 18, n. 3, p. 225-230, 2010.
Duração: 
225-230
Publicador: 
Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
Palavras-chaves: 
  • Biomechanics
  • Dental implants
  • Dental prosthesis
  • Implant-supported dental prosthesis
Fonte: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000300005
Endereço permanente: 
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22814
Direitos de acesso: 
Acesso aberto
Tipo: 
outro
Fonte completa:
http://repositorio.unesp.br/handle/11449/22814
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

Não há nenhum arquivo associado com este item.
 

Itens do Acervo digital da UNESP são protegidos por direitos autorais reservados a menos que seja expresso o contrário.