You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/40509
Title: 
Recommended Guidelines for the Conduct and Evaluation of Prognostic Studies in Veterinary Oncology
Author(s): 
Institution: 
  • Michigan State University
  • NCI
  • Univ Sydney
  • Charles Sturt Univ
  • Univ Florida
  • BrightHeart Vet Ctr
  • University of Guelph
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
  • Univ Padua
  • N Carolina State Univ
  • ARUP Labs
  • Univ Complutense Madrid
  • Univ Penn
  • Hills Pet Nutr Inc
  • Univ Missouri
  • Swedish Univ Agr Sci
  • Colorado State Univ
  • Univ Utrecht
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
  • Purdue Univ
  • Armed Forces Inst Pathol
  • Cornell Univ
  • MPI Res
  • Idexx Reference Labs
  • Univ Calif Davis
  • Antech Diagnost
  • Univ Tokyo
  • Univ Georgia
  • Univ Bologna
  • Bridge Pathol Ltd
  • Pfizer Ltd
  • NSG Pathol
  • VDx Vet Diagnost
  • Ohio State Univ
  • Yager Best Histovet
ISSN: 
0300-9858
Sponsorship: 
  • American College of Veterinary Pathologists' Oncology Committee
  • World Small Animal Veterinary Association
Abstract: 
There is an increasing need for more accurate prognostic and predictive markers in veterinary oncology because of an increasing number of treatment options, the increased financial costs associated with treatment, and the emotional stress experienced by owners in association with the disease and its treatment. Numerous studies have evaluated potential prognostic and predictive markers for veterinary neoplastic diseases, but there are no established guidelines or standards for the conduct and reporting of prognostic studies in veterinary medicine. This lack of standardization has made the evaluation and comparison of studies difficult. Most important, translating these results to clinical applications is problematic. To address this issue, the American College of Veterinary Pathologists' Oncology Committee organized an initiative to establish guidelines for the conduct and reporting of prognostic studies in veterinary oncology. The goal of this initiative is to increase the quality and standardization of veterinary prognostic studies to facilitate independent evaluation, validation, comparison, and implementation of study results. This article represents a consensus statement on the conduct and reporting of prognostic studies in veterinary oncology from veterinary pathologists and oncologists from around the world. These guidelines should be considered a recommendation based on the current state of knowledge in the field, and they will need to be continually reevaluated and revised as the field of veterinary oncology continues to progress. As mentioned, these guidelines were developed through an initiative of the American College of Veterinary Pathologists' Oncology Committee, and they have been reviewed and endorsed by the World Small Animal Veterinary Association.
Issue Date: 
1-Jan-2011
Citation: 
Veterinary Pathology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc, v. 48, n. 1, p. 7-18, 2011.
Publisher: 
Sage Publications Inc
Keywords: 
  • cancer
  • guidelines
  • prognostication
  • standardization
  • veterinary oncology
Source: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300985810377187
URI: 
Access Rights: 
Acesso restrito
Type: 
outro
Source:
http://repositorio.unesp.br/handle/11449/40509
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.