You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/68548
Title: 
Bone healing in surgically created defects treated with either bioactive glass particles, a calcium sulfate barrier, or a combination of both materials: A histological and histometric study in rat tibias
Author(s): 
Institution: 
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
ISSN: 
  • 0905-7161
  • 1600-0501
Abstract: 
Objective: The purpose of this study was to histologically analyze the influence of bioactive glass and/or a calcium sulfate barrier on bone healing in surgically created defects in rat tibias. Material and methods: Sixty-four rats were divided into 4 groups: C (control), CS (calcium sulfate), BG (bioactive glass), and BG/CS (bioactive glass/calcium sulfate). A surgical defect was created in the tibia of each animal. In Group CS, a calcium sulfate barrier was placed to cover the defect. In Group BG the defect was filled with bioactive glass. In Group BG/CS, it was filled with bioactive glass and protected by a barrier of calcium sulfate. Animals were sacrificed at 10 or 30 days post-operative. The formation of new bone in the cortical area of the defect was evaluated histomorphometrically. Results: At 10 days post-operative, Group C presented significantly more bone formation than Groups CS, BG, or BG/CS. No statistically significant differences were found between the experimental groups. At 30 days post-operative, Group C demonstrated significantly more bone formation than the experimental groups. Groups CS and BG/CS showed significantly more bone formation than Group BG. No statistically significant differences were found between Group CS and BG/CS. Conclusions: (a) the control groups had significantly more bone formation than the experimental groups; (b) at 10 days post-operative, no significant differences were found between any of the experimental groups; and (c) at 30 days post-operative, the groups with a calcium sulfate barrier had significantly more bone formation than the group that used bioactive glass only. Copyright © Blackwell Munksgaard 2005.
Issue Date: 
1-Dec-2005
Citation: 
Clinical Oral Implants Research, v. 16, n. 6, p. 683-691, 2005.
Time Duration: 
683-691
Keywords: 
  • Bioactive
  • Bone regeneration
  • Bone substitutes
  • Calcium sulfate
  • Glass
  • bioglass
  • calcium sulfate
  • animal
  • artificial membrane
  • bone prosthesis
  • bone regeneration
  • ceramics
  • comparative study
  • drug effect
  • image processing
  • male
  • methodology
  • periodontics
  • physiology
  • rat
  • tibia
  • Animals
  • Bone Regeneration
  • Bone Substitutes
  • Calcium Sulfate
  • Ceramics
  • Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Male
  • Membranes, Artificial
  • Rats
  • Tibia
Source: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01090.x
URI: 
Access Rights: 
Acesso restrito
Type: 
outro
Source:
http://repositorio.unesp.br/handle/11449/68548
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.