You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/71495
Title: 
Treatment of gingival recession with collagen membrane and DFDBA: A histometric study in dogs
Author(s): 
Institution: 
  • Educational Foundation of Barretos (UNIFEB)
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
ISSN: 
  • 1806-8324
  • 1807-3107
Abstract: 
In a previous study, we evaluated the findings related to the use of resorbable collagen membranes in humans along with DFDBA (demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft). The aim of this subsequent study was to histometrically evaluate in dogs, the healing response of gingival recessions treated with collagen membrane + DFDBA (Guided Tissue Regeneration, GTR) compared to a coronally positioned flap (CPF). Two types of treatment were randomly carried out in a split-mouth study. Group 1 was considered as test (GTR: collagen membrane + DFDBA), whereas Group 2 stood for the control (only CPF). The dogs were given chemical bacterial plaque control with 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate during a 90-day repair period. Afterwards, the animals were killed to obtain biopsies and histometric evaluation of the process of cementum and bone formation, epithelial migration and gingival level. A statistically significant difference was found between groups with a larger extension of neoformed cementum (GTR = 32.72%; CPF = 18.82%; p = 0.0004), new bone (GTR = 23.20%; CPF = 09.90%; p = 0.0401) and with a smaller area of residual gingival recession in the test group (GTR = 50.69%; CPF = 59.73%; p = 0.0055) compared to the control group. The only item assessed that showed no statistical difference was epithelial proliferation on the root surface, with means of 15.14% for the GTR group and 20.34% for the CPF group (p = 0.0890). Within the limits of this study we concluded that the treatment of gingival recession defects with GTR, associating collagen membrane with DFDBA, showed better outcomes in terms of a larger extension of neoformed cementum and bone, as well as in terms of a smaller proportion of residual recessions.
Issue Date: 
28-Dec-2009
Citation: 
Brazilian Oral Research, v. 23, n. 3, p. 307-312, 2009.
Time Duration: 
307-312
Keywords: 
  • Comparative
  • Gingival recession
  • Guided tissue regeneration
  • Histology
  • Reconstructive surgical procedures
  • collagen
  • animal
  • artificial membrane
  • bone transplantation
  • comparative study
  • dog
  • freeze drying
  • gingiva disease
  • histology
  • methodology
  • pathology
  • periodontics
  • wound healing
  • Animals
  • Bone Demineralization Technique
  • Bone Transplantation
  • Collagen
  • Dogs
  • Freeze Drying
  • Gingival Recession
  • Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal
  • Membranes, Artificial
  • Wound Healing
Source: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242009000300014
URI: 
Access Rights: 
Acesso aberto
Type: 
outro
Source:
http://repositorio.unesp.br/handle/11449/71495
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.