Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/74551
- Title:
- Dentin hypersensitivity after teeth bleaching with in-office systems. randomized clinical trial
- University of Chile
- Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
- 0894-8275
- Purpose: To comparatively and prospectively compare in a randomized clinical trial, dentin hypersensitivity after treatment with three in-office bleaching systems, based on hydrogen peroxide at different concentrations, with and without light source activation. Methods: 88 individuals were included according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subjects were randomly divided into the following three treatment groups: Group 1 was treated with three 15-minute applications of hydrogen peroxide at 15% with titanium dioxide (Lase Peroxide Lite) that was light-activated (Light Plus Whitening Lase) with five cycles of 1 minute and 30 seconds each cycle, giving a total treatment time of 45 minutes; Group 2 was treated with three 10-minute applications of hydrogen peroxide at 35% (Lase Peroxide Sensy), activated by light (LPWL) same activation cycles than Group 1, with a total treatment time of 30 minutes; Group 3 was treated with only one application for 45 minutes of hydrogen peroxide at 35% (Whitegold Office) without light activation. Each subject underwent one session of bleaching on the anterior teeth according to the manufacturers' instructions. Dentin sensitivity was recorded with a visual analogue scale (VAS) at baseline, immediately after, and at 7 and 30 days after treatment using a stimulus of an evaporative blowing triple syringe for 3 seconds on the upper central incisors from a distance of 1 cm. A Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Mann-Whitney test was performed for statistical analysis. Results: All groups showed increased sensitivity immediately after treatment. Group 1 displayed less changes relative to baseline with no significant differences (P= 0.104). At 7 and 30 days after treatment, a comparison of VAS values indicated no significant differences between all groups (P= 0.598 and 0.489, respectively).
- 1-Feb-2013
- American Journal of Dentistry, v. 26, n. 1, p. 10-14, 2013.
- 10-14
- hydrogen peroxide
- photosensitizing agent
- titanium
- titanium dioxide
- tooth bleaching agent
- adolescent
- adult
- comparative study
- controlled clinical trial
- controlled study
- dental procedure
- dentin sensitivity
- diode laser
- double blind procedure
- female
- follow up
- human
- male
- methodology
- pain assessment
- photochemotherapy
- phototherapy
- prospective study
- randomized controlled trial
- time
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Dentin Sensitivity
- Double-Blind Method
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Hydrogen Peroxide
- Lasers, Semiconductor
- Male
- Pain Measurement
- Photochemotherapy
- Photosensitizing Agents
- Phototherapy
- Prospective Studies
- Time Factors
- Titanium
- Tooth Bleaching
- Tooth Bleaching Agents
- Young Adult
- http://www.amjdent.com/Archive/Abstracts/2013/February%202013%20Abstracts.html#Milia
- Acesso restrito
- outro
- http://repositorio.unesp.br/handle/11449/74551
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.