You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/74551
Title: 
Dentin hypersensitivity after teeth bleaching with in-office systems. randomized clinical trial
Author(s): 
Institution: 
  • University of Chile
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
ISSN: 
0894-8275
Abstract: 
Purpose: To comparatively and prospectively compare in a randomized clinical trial, dentin hypersensitivity after treatment with three in-office bleaching systems, based on hydrogen peroxide at different concentrations, with and without light source activation. Methods: 88 individuals were included according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subjects were randomly divided into the following three treatment groups: Group 1 was treated with three 15-minute applications of hydrogen peroxide at 15% with titanium dioxide (Lase Peroxide Lite) that was light-activated (Light Plus Whitening Lase) with five cycles of 1 minute and 30 seconds each cycle, giving a total treatment time of 45 minutes; Group 2 was treated with three 10-minute applications of hydrogen peroxide at 35% (Lase Peroxide Sensy), activated by light (LPWL) same activation cycles than Group 1, with a total treatment time of 30 minutes; Group 3 was treated with only one application for 45 minutes of hydrogen peroxide at 35% (Whitegold Office) without light activation. Each subject underwent one session of bleaching on the anterior teeth according to the manufacturers' instructions. Dentin sensitivity was recorded with a visual analogue scale (VAS) at baseline, immediately after, and at 7 and 30 days after treatment using a stimulus of an evaporative blowing triple syringe for 3 seconds on the upper central incisors from a distance of 1 cm. A Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Mann-Whitney test was performed for statistical analysis. Results: All groups showed increased sensitivity immediately after treatment. Group 1 displayed less changes relative to baseline with no significant differences (P= 0.104). At 7 and 30 days after treatment, a comparison of VAS values indicated no significant differences between all groups (P= 0.598 and 0.489, respectively).
Issue Date: 
1-Feb-2013
Citation: 
American Journal of Dentistry, v. 26, n. 1, p. 10-14, 2013.
Time Duration: 
10-14
Keywords: 
  • hydrogen peroxide
  • photosensitizing agent
  • titanium
  • titanium dioxide
  • tooth bleaching agent
  • adolescent
  • adult
  • comparative study
  • controlled clinical trial
  • controlled study
  • dental procedure
  • dentin sensitivity
  • diode laser
  • double blind procedure
  • female
  • follow up
  • human
  • male
  • methodology
  • pain assessment
  • photochemotherapy
  • phototherapy
  • prospective study
  • randomized controlled trial
  • time
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Dentin Sensitivity
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Hydrogen Peroxide
  • Lasers, Semiconductor
  • Male
  • Pain Measurement
  • Photochemotherapy
  • Photosensitizing Agents
  • Phototherapy
  • Prospective Studies
  • Time Factors
  • Titanium
  • Tooth Bleaching
  • Tooth Bleaching Agents
  • Young Adult
Source: 
http://www.amjdent.com/Archive/Abstracts/2013/February%202013%20Abstracts.html#Milia
URI: 
Access Rights: 
Acesso restrito
Type: 
outro
Source:
http://repositorio.unesp.br/handle/11449/74551
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.