You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/110028
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPerbiche-neves, Gilmar-
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Carlos E.f. Da-
dc.contributor.authorNogueira, Marcos G.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-01T13:08:46Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T19:45:38Z-
dc.date.available2014-10-01T13:08:46Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T19:45:38Z-
dc.date.issued2014-06-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702014000300005-
dc.identifier.citationZoologia (Curitiba). Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia, v. 31, n. 3, p. 239-244, 2014.-
dc.identifier.issn1984-4670-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/110028-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/110028-
dc.description.abstractSpecies richness and geographical distribution of Cyclopoida freshwater copepods were analyzed along the La Plata River basin. Ninety-six samples were taken from 24 sampling sites, twelve sites for zooplankton in open waters and twelve sites for zooplankton within macrophyte stands, including reservoirs and lotic stretches. There were, on average, three species per sample in the plankton compared to five per sample in macrophytes. Six species were exclusive to the plankton, 10 to macrophyte stands, and 17 were common to both. Only one species was found in similar proportions in plankton and macrophytes, while five species were widely found in plankton, and thirteen in macrophytes. The distinction between species from open water zooplankton and macrophytes was supported by nonmetric multidimensional analysis. There was no distinct pattern of endemicity within the basin, and double sampling contributes to this result. This lack of sub-regional faunal differentiation is in accordance with other studies that have shown that cyclopoids generally have wide geographical distribution in the Neotropics and that some species there are cosmopolitan. This contrasts with other freshwater copepods such as Calanoida and some Harpacticoida. We conclude that sampling plankton and macrophytes together provided a more accurate estimate of the richness and geographical distribution of these organisms than sampling in either one of those zones alone.en
dc.format.extent239-244-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherSociedade Brasileira de Zoologia-
dc.sourceSciELO-
dc.subjectLa Plata River basinen
dc.subjectreservoirsen
dc.subjectriversen
dc.subjectzooplanktonen
dc.titleEstimating cyclopoid copepod species richness and geographical distribution (Crustacea) across a large hydrographical basin: comparing between samples from water column (plankton) and macrophyte standsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade de São Paulo Instituto de Biociências Departamento de Zoologia-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Biociências Departamento de Zoologia-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Biociências Departamento de Zoologia-
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1984-46702014000300005-
dc.identifier.scieloS1984-46702014000300005-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.fileS1984-46702014000300005.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofZoologia (Curitiba)-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.