You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/111306
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSantamaria, Mauro Pedrine-
dc.contributor.authorSuaid, Fabricia Ferreira-
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Marcelo Diniz-
dc.contributor.authorNociti Junior, Francisco Humberto-
dc.contributor.authorCasati, Marcio Zaffalon-
dc.contributor.authorSallum, Antonio Wilson-
dc.contributor.authorSallum, Enilson Antonio-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-03T13:07:09Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T19:58:52Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-03T13:07:09Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T19:58:52Z-
dc.date.issued2013-09-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.11607/prd.0396-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, v. 33, n. 5, p. 679-U137, 2013.-
dc.identifier.issn0198-7569-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/111306-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/111306-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate, clinically and histometrically, the effects of subgingival placement of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restoration during flap surgery. Nine dogs were included in this study. The mandibular canines were randomly assigned to receive either a transgingival resin-modified glass-ionomer restoration (test group) or no restoration (control group). The apical margins of the restorations in the test group and a reference notch on those in the control group were placed at the level of the bone crest. Clinical parameters were recorded 7 days before sacrifice. The dogs were sacrificed after 107 days, and undecalcified sections were obtained for histologic evaluation. Clinically, both groups presented significant clinical attachment loss and an increase in probing depth, but differences between groups were not statistically significant (P > .05). Histologically, a significant difference between groups was observed for length of epithelium (test, 4.05 +/- 0.57 mm; control, 3.36 +/- 0.63 mm; P = .01). The test group showed more bone resorption (2.02 +/- 1.47 mm) when compared with the control group (0.74 +/- 0.37 mm) (P = .048). It can be concluded that even with the claimed favorable properties of resin-modified glass ionomer, the presence of the restoration within the biologic width causes increased migration of the apical epithelium and bone resorption.en
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)-
dc.format.extent679-U137-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Inc-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.titleHealing Patterns After Subgingival Placement of a Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Restoration: A Histometric Study in Dogsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Coll Dent FOSJC, Sao Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Campinas UNICAMP, Dept Periodont & Prosthodont, Div Periodont, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Sao Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Coll Dent FOSJC, Sao Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000323537200016-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.