You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/112030
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCelentano, Danielle-
dc.contributor.authorRousseau, Guillaume Xavier-
dc.contributor.authorEngel, Vera Lex-
dc.contributor.authorFacanha, Cristiane Lima-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Elivaldo Moreira de-
dc.contributor.authorMoura, Emanoel Gomes de-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-03T13:09:11Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T20:10:15Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-03T13:09:11Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T20:10:15Z-
dc.date.issued2014-01-27-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-10-11-
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Ethnobiology And Ethnomedicine. London: Biomed Central Ltd, v. 10, 14 p., 2014.-
dc.identifier.issn1746-4269-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/112030-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/112030-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Riparian forests provide ecosystem services that are essential for human well-being. The Pepital River is the main water supply for Alcantara (Brazil) and its forests are disappearing. This is affecting water volume and distribution in the region. Promoting forest restoration is imperative. In deprived regions, restoration success depends on the integration of ecology, livelihoods and traditional knowledge (TEK). In this study, an interdisciplinary research framework is proposed to design riparian forest restoration strategies based on ecological data, TEK and social needs.Methods: This study takes place in a region presenting a complex history of human relocation and land tenure. Local populations from seven villages were surveyed to document livelihood (including 'free-listing' of agricultural crops and homegarden tree species). Additionally, their perceptions toward environmental changes were explored through semi-structured interviews (n = 79). Ethnobotanical information on forest species and their uses were assessed by local-specialists (n = 19). Remnants of conserved forests were surveyed to access ecological information on tree species (three plots of 1,000 m(2)).Results included descriptive statistics, frequency and Smith's index of salience of the free-list results. Results: The local population depends primarily on slash-and-burn subsistence agriculture to meet their needs. Interviewees showed a strong empirical knowledge about the environmental problems of the river, and of their causes, consequences and potential solutions. Twenty-four tree species (dbh > 10 cm) were found at the reference sites. Tree density averaged 510 individuals per hectare (stdv = 91.6); and 12 species were considered the most abundant (density > 10ind/ha). There was a strong consensus among plant-specialists about the most important trees. The species lists from reference sites and plant-specialists presented an important convergence.Conclusions: Slash-and-burn agriculture is the main source of livelihood but also the main driver of forest degradation. Effective restoration approaches must transform problems into solutions by empowering local people. Successional agroforestry combining annual crops and trees may be a suitable transitional phase for restoration. The model must be designed collectively and include species of ecological, cultural, and socioeconomic value. In deprived communities of the Amazon, forest restoration must be a process that combines environmental and social gains.en
dc.description.sponsorshipState of Maranhao Research Foundation (FAPEMA)-
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)-
dc.format.extent14-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherBiomed Central Ltd.-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.titlePerceptions of environmental change and use of traditional knowledge to plan riparian forest restoration with relocated communities in Alcantara, Eastern Amazonen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Maranhão (UFMA)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (UNEMAT)-
dc.description.affiliationFed Univ Maranhao UFMA, Amazonian Network Biodivers & Biotechnol Grad Pro, BR-65000000 Sao Luis, MA, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationMaranhao State Univ UEMA, Agroecol Grad Program, BR-65054970 Sao Luis, MA, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Coll Agr Sci FCA, BR-18610307 Botucatu, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationState Univ Mato Grosso UNEMAT, Amazonian Network Biodivers & Biotechnol Grad Pro, DNER, BR-78200000 Caceres, MT, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationFed Univ Maranhao UFMA, Biodivers & Conservat Grad Program, BR-65000000 Sao Luis, MA, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Coll Agr Sci FCA, BR-18610307 Botucatu, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1746-4269-10-11-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000334622700001-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.fileWOS000334622700001.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.