You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/112101
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBraga, Lucia Bollini-
dc.contributor.authorSilveira, Jose Luz-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Marcio Evaristo da-
dc.contributor.authorMachin, Einara Blanco-
dc.contributor.authorPedroso, Daniel Travieso-
dc.contributor.authorTuna, Celso Eduardo-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-03T13:09:14Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T20:10:25Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-03T13:09:14Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T20:10:25Z-
dc.date.issued2014-02-05-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.10.053-
dc.identifier.citationApplied Thermal Engineering. Oxford: Pergamon-elsevier Science Ltd, v. 63, n. 1, p. 354-361, 2014.-
dc.identifier.issn1359-4311-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/112101-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/112101-
dc.description.abstractIn the recent years the fuel cells have received much attention. Among various technologies, the Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) is currently the most appropriate and is used in several vehicles prototype. A comparative technical, economical and ecological analysis between an Internal Combustion Engine fueled with Diesel driving an electricity Generator (ICE-G) and a PEMFC fed by hydrogen produced by ethanol steam reforming was performed. The technical analysis showed the advantages of the PEMFC in comparison to the ICE-G based in energetic and exergetic aspects. The economic analysis shows that fuel cells are not economic competitive when compared to internal combustion engine driving an electricity generator with the same generation capacity; it will only be economically feasible in a long term; due to the large investments required. The environmental analysis was based on concepts of CO2 equivalent, pollution indicator and ecological efficiency. Different to the ICE-G system, the Fuel Cell does not emit pollutants directly and the emission related to this technology is linked mainly with hydrogen production. The ecological efficiency of PEMFC was 96% considering the carbon dioxide cycle, for ICE-G system this parameter reach 51%. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)-
dc.format.extent354-361-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectEconomic analysisen
dc.subjectEcological analysisen
dc.subjectTechnical analysisen
dc.subjectInternal combustion engineen
dc.subjectProton exchange membrane fuel cellen
dc.titleComparative analysis between a PEM fuel cell and an internal combustion engine driving an electricity generator: Technical, economical and ecological aspectsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, UNESP, BR-12516410 Guaratingueta, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, UNESP, BR-12516410 Guaratingueta, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.10.053-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000331021600036-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Thermal Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.