You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/113082
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSa Filho, M. F.-
dc.contributor.authorMarques, M. O.-
dc.contributor.authorGimenes, L. U.-
dc.contributor.authorTorres-Junior, J. R. S.-
dc.contributor.authorBatista, E. O. S.-
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, J. P. B.-
dc.contributor.authorBaruselli, P. S.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-03T13:11:24Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T20:14:05Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-03T13:11:24Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T20:14:05Z-
dc.date.issued2014-01-10-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.11.008-
dc.identifier.citationAnimal Reproduction Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 144, n. 1-2, p. 1-5, 2014.-
dc.identifier.issn0378-4320-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/113082-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/113082-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of the PGF(2 alpha) treatment given at the onset of a synchronization of ovulation protocol using a norgestomet (NORG) ear implant on ovarian follicular dynamics (Experiment 1) and pregnancy per AI (P/AI; Experiment 2) in cyclic (CL present) Bos indicus heifers. In Experiment 1, a total of 46 heifers were presynchronized using two consecutive doses of PGF(2 alpha) 12 days apart. At first day of the synchronization protocol the heifers received implants containing 3 mg of NORG and 2 mg of estradiol benzoate (EB). At the same time, heifers were randomly assigned to receive 150 mg of D-cloprostenol (n =23; PGF(2 alpha)) or no additional treatment (n =23; Control). When the ear implants were removed 8 days later, all heifers received a PGF(2 alpha) treatment and 1 mg of EB was given 24 h later. The follicular diameter and interval to ovulation were determined by transrectal ultrasonography. No effects of PGF(2 alpha) treatment on the diameter of the largest follicle present were observed at implant removal (PGF(2 alpha) =9.8 +/- 0.4 vs. Control = 10.0 +/- 0.3 mm; P=0.73) or after 24h (PGF(2 alpha) =11.1 +/- 0.4 vs. Control = 11.0 +/- 0.4 mm; P= 0.83). No differences in the time of ovulation after ear implant removal (PGF20 =70.8 +/- 1.2 vs. Control = 73.3 +/- 0.9 h; P=0.10) or in the ovulation rate (PGF(2 alpha) = 87.0 vs. Control =82.6%; P= 0.64) between treatments were observed. In Experiment 2,280 cyclic heifers were synchronized using the same experimental design described above (PGF(2 alpha); n=143 and Control; n=137), at random day of the estrous cycle. All heifers received 300 III of equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) and 0.5 mg of estradiol cypionate (as ovulatory stimulus) when the NORG ear implants were removed. Timed artificial insemination (TAI) was performed 48 h after implant removal and the pregnancy diagnosis was conducted 30 days later. No effects on the P/AI due to PGF(2 alpha) treatment were observed (PGF(2 alpha) =51.7 vs. Control =57.7%; P= 0.29). In conclusion, PGF(2 alpha) treatment at the onset of NORG-based protocols for the synchronization of ovulation did not alter the ovarian follicular responses or the P/AI in cyclic Bos indicus beef heifers synchronized for TAI. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.description.sponsorshipGeraembryo (Londrina-PR, Brazil)-
dc.description.sponsorshipMSD Animal Health (Sao Paulo, Brazil)-
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)-
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)-
dc.format.extent1-5-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectBovineen
dc.subjectHormonal therapyen
dc.subjectProgesteroneen
dc.subjectLuteolysisen
dc.subjectNeloreen
dc.titleProstaglandin treatment at the onset of norgestomet and estradiol-based synchronization protocols did not alter the ovarian follicular dynamics or pregnancy per timed artificial insemination in cyclic Bos indicus heifersen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionGeraembryo-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Maranhão (UFMA)-
dc.contributor.institutionAgência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA)-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Sao Paulo, FMVZ, Dept Anim Reprod, BR-09500900 Sao Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationGeraembryo, Cornelio Procopio, PR, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUNESP, FCAV, Dept Med Vet Prevent & Reprod Anim, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Maranhao, Ctr Ciencias Agr & Ambientais, BR-65500000 Chapadinha, MA, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationAPTA, BR-12400970 Pindamonhangaba, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP, FCAV, Dept Med Vet Prevent & Reprod Anim, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.11.008-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000330824000001-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Reproduction Science-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.