You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/113345
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Regis de C.-
dc.contributor.authorTonetto, Aurelio F.-
dc.contributor.authorPeres, Cleto K.-
dc.contributor.authorBranco, Ciro Cesar Zanini-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-03T13:11:37Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T20:14:40Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-03T13:11:37Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T20:14:40Z-
dc.date.issued2013-12-01-
dc.identifierhttp://www.limnetica.com/Limnetica/Limne32/L32b287_Stream_macroalgal_communities_subtropical_biomes.pdf-
dc.identifier.citationLimnetica. Mislata (valencia): Asoc Espan Limnol-mislata, v. 32, n. 2, p. 287-301, 2013.-
dc.identifier.issn0213-8409-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/113345-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/113345-
dc.description.abstractLandscape properties must be considered in the interpretation of ecological patterns of stream macroalgal communities. In this study, we sampled streams with different types of riparian cover from two biomes (highland grassland, HG, and seasonal semideciduous forest, SSF) for a period of one year. Each stream was visited four times, once in each season, during which we observed the algal growth and recorded measurements of a set of physical and chemical properties. Nineteen macroalgal taxa were recorded for HG, while 21 were recorded for SSF, but only three species were common to both biomes. Student's t-test results showed that significant differences existed between HG and SSF only for stream depth for abiotic variables and for abundance for biotic variables, while the results of a detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) revealed that the taxonomic compositions were sharply different at the landscape level. In addition, the DCA results showed that when each landscape was considered individually, the HG macroalgal communities had a clear spatial structure, while for SSF macroalgal communities no spatial structure was detected. These results suggest that although the taxonomic richness of HG and SSF are relatively similar, the landscape conditions of each biome, mainly riparian cover types, could be relevant in the determination of quantitative and qualitative differences in the stream macroalgal communities both between and within biomes.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)-
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)-
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)-
dc.format.extent287-301-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherAsoc Espan Limnol-mislata-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectAquatic vegetationen
dc.subjectsubtropical biomeen
dc.subjectlotic systemsen
dc.subjectstream algaeen
dc.subjectSouth Americaen
dc.titleThe influence of landscape on the spatial and temporal distribution of stream macroalgal communities of two types of subtropical biomesen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionFed Univ Latin American Integrat-
dc.description.affiliationUNESP, Sao Paulo State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, BR-19806900 Assis, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationFed Univ Latin American Integrat, UNILA, BR-85867970 Foz do Iguacu, PR, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP, Sao Paulo State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, BR-19806900 Assis, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 07/52608-1-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCAPES: 1072/11-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 302354/2008-5-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000329534000010-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofLimnetica-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.