You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/114385
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShintcovsk, Ricardo Lima-
dc.contributor.authorKnop, Luegya Amorim Henriques-
dc.contributor.authorGandini Jr, Luiz Gonzaga-
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Lidia Parsekian-
dc.contributor.authorPires, Aline Segatto-
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-02T12:39:29Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T20:16:59Z-
dc.date.available2015-02-02T12:39:29Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T20:16:59Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0022-
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian Oral Research. Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO, v. 29, n. 1, p. 01-08, 2015.-
dc.identifier.issn1806-8324-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/114385-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/114385-
dc.description.abstractThis study aims at comparing conventional and nickel-free metal bracket surface characteristics with elemental composition by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). The sample consisted of 40 lower incisor brackets divided into four groups: ABZ = conventional brackets, Kirium Abzil 3M® (n = 10); RL = conventional brackets, Roth Light Morelli® (n = 10); NF = nickel-free brackets, Nickel-Free Morelli® (n = 10); and RM = nickel-free brackets, Roth Max Morelli® (n = 10). Qualitative evaluation of the bracket surface was performed using SEM, whereby surface features were described and compared. The elemental composition was analyzed by EDS. According to surface analysis, groups ABZ and RL showed a homogeneous surface, with better finishing, whereas the surfaces in groups NF and RM were rougher. The chemical components with the highest percentage were Fe, Cr and C. Groups NF and MR showed no nickel in their composition. In conclusion, the bracket surface of the ABZ and RL groups was more homogeneous, with grooves and pores, whereas the surfaces in groups NF and RM showed numerous flaws, cracks, pores and grooves. The chemical composition analysis confirmed that the nickel-free brackets had no Ni in their composition, as confirmed by the manufacturer’s specifications, and were therefore safe to use in patients with a medical history of allergy to this metal.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)-
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)-
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)-
dc.format.extent01-08-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherSociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO-
dc.sourceSciELO-
dc.subjectOrthodontic Bracketsen
dc.subjectNickelen
dc.subjectHypersensitivityen
dc.subjectMicroscopyen
dc.titleComparison surface characteristics and chemical composition of conventional metallic and Nickel-Free bracketsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de São Paulo School of Dentistry at Araraquara Department of Pediatric Clinic-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual de São Paulo School of Dentistry at Araraquara Department of Pediatric Clinic-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul School of Dentistry Department of Dental Materials-
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0022-
dc.identifier.scieloS1806-83242015000100218-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.fileS1806-83242015000100218.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Oral Research-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.