You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/115292
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRossi, Denise Martineli-
dc.contributor.authorMorcelli, Mary Hellen-
dc.contributor.authorCardozo, Adalgiso Coscrato-
dc.contributor.authorDenadai, Benedito Sergio-
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, Mauro-
dc.contributor.authorNavega, Marcelo Tavella-
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-24T13:57:57Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T20:18:58Z-
dc.date.available2015-02-24T13:57:57Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T20:18:58Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3233/BMR-140509-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, v. 28, p. 1-8, 2014.-
dc.identifier.issn1053-8127-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/115292-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/115292-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Investigation and discrimination of neuromuscular variables related to the complex aetiology of low back pain could contribute to clarifying the factors associated with symptoms. Objective: Analysing the discriminative power of neuromuscular variables in low back pain. Methods: This study compared muscle endurance, proprioception and isometric trunk assessments between women with low back pain (LBP, n=14) and a control group (CG, n=14). Multivariate analysis of variance and discriminant analysis of the data were performed. Results: The muscle endurance time (s) was shorter in the LBP group than in the CG (p=0.004) with values of 85.81 (37.79) and 134.25 (43.88), respectively. The peak torque (Nm/kg) for trunk extension was 2.48 (0.69) in the LBP group and 3.56 (0.88) in the GG (p=0.001); for trunk flexion, the mean torque was 1.49 (0.40) in the LBP group and 1.85 (0.39) in the CG (p=0.023). The repositioning error (degrees) before the endurance test was 2.66 (1.36) in the LBP group and 2.41 (1.46) in the CG (p=0.664), and after the endurance test, it was 2.95 (1.94) in the LBP group and 2.00 (1.16) in the CG (p=0.06). Furthermore, the variables showed discrimination between the groups (p=0.007), with 78.6% of the individuals with low back pain correctly classified in the LBP group. In turn, variables related to muscle activation showed no difference in discrimination between the groups (p=0.369). Conclusion: Based on these findings, the clinical management of low back pain should consist of both resistance and strength training, particularly in the extensor muscles.en
dc.format.extent1-8-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceCurrículo Lattes-
dc.titleDiscriminant analysis of neuromuscular variables in chronic low back painpt
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Fisioterapia e Terapia Ocupacional, Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências - Campus de Marília, Marília, Avenida Hygino Muzzi Filho, 737, Mirante, CEP 17525900, SP, Brasil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Fisioterapia e Terapia Ocupacional, Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências - Campus de Marília, Marília, Avenida Hygino Muzzi Filho, 737, Mirante, CEP 17525900, SP, Brasil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Physical Education, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/BMR-140509-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation-
dc.identifier.lattes1153464448003029-
dc.identifier.lattes2155913765460961-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.