You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/116259
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPellizzer, Eduardo Piza-
dc.contributor.authorSantiago Junior, Joel Ferreira-
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro Villa, Luiz Marcelo-
dc.contributor.authorSouza Batista, Victor Eduardo de-
dc.contributor.authorMello, Caroline Cantieri de-
dc.contributor.authorFaria Almeida, Daniel Augusto de-
dc.contributor.authorHonrio, Heitor Marques-
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-18T15:52:58Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T20:24:22Z-
dc.date.available2015-03-18T15:52:58Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T20:24:22Z-
dc.date.issued2014-10-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00340-014-5827-9-
dc.identifier.citationApplied Physics B-lasers And Optics. New York: Springer, v. 117, n. 1, p. 235-244, 2014.-
dc.identifier.issn0946-2171-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/116259-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/116259-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects that splinting and different lengths of implants have on the stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses by photoelastic analysis. A total of five photoelastic resin models were made with different proposed situations, and 400 load applications were performed for the analysis. Compared with the unitary prosthesis, the splinted implant-supported prosthesis acted favorably in the distribution of stresses and strains to the implant (p < 0.001). The increase in length was a significant factor in the stress distribution (p < 0.05) and, ultimately, the overall reduction in stress. It was concluded that the splinted implant-supported prosthesis behaved better biomechanically compared with the unitary prosthesis.en
dc.format.extent235-244-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.titlePhotoelastic stress analysis of splinted and unitary implant-supported prosthesesen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-16016050 Sao Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Sao Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Discipline Res Methodol & Stat, Dept Pediat Dent Orthodont & Publ Hlth, BR-17012901 Sao Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-16016050 Sao Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00340-014-5827-9-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000342225300028-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Physics B-lasers And Optics-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record Show full item record   View Statistics
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.