You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/116574
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoiato, Marcelo Coelho-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Daniela Micheline dos-
dc.contributor.authorSantiago, J. F. Jr.-
dc.contributor.authorMoreno, A.-
dc.contributor.authorPellizzer, Eduardo Piza-
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-18T15:53:32Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T20:25:06Z-
dc.date.available2015-03-18T15:53:32Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T20:25:06Z-
dc.date.issued2014-09-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.02.016-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, v. 43, n. 9, p. 1108-1116, 2014.-
dc.identifier.issn0901-5027-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/116574-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/116574-
dc.description.abstractBone quality and quantity are important factors with regard to the survival rate of dental implants. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of dental implants inserted in low-density bone and to determine the survival rate of dental implants with surface treatments over time. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken by two independent individuals; the Medline/PubMed database was searched for the period July 1975 to March 2013. Relevant reports on bone quality and osseointegration of dental implants were selected. The search retrieved 1018 references, and after inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 19 studies were selected for review. A total of 3937 patients, who had received a total of 12,465 dental implants, were analyzed. The survival rates of dental implants according to the bone density were: type I, 97.6%; type II, 96.2%; type III, 96.5%; and type IV, 88.8%. The survival rate of treated surface implants inserted in low-density bone was higher (97.1%) than that of machined surface implants (91.6%). Surface-treated dental implants inserted in low-density bone have a high survival rate and may be indicated for oral rehabilitation. However, more randomized studies are required to better evaluate this issue.en
dc.format.extent1108-1116-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstone-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectdental implantsen
dc.subjectalveolar boneen
dc.subjectimplant-supported dental prosthesisen
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trialen
dc.titleLongevity of dental implants in type IV bone: a systematic reviewen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Sao Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Sao Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijom.2014.02.016-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000341469800014-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3800-3050pt
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.