You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/116791
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCasartelli-Alves, L.-
dc.contributor.authorBoechat, V. C.-
dc.contributor.authorMacedo-Couto, R.-
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, L. C.-
dc.contributor.authorNicolau, J. L.-
dc.contributor.authorNeves, L. B.-
dc.contributor.authorMillar, P. R.-
dc.contributor.authorVicente, R. T.-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, R. V. C.-
dc.contributor.authorMuniz, A. G.-
dc.contributor.authorBonna, I. C. F.-
dc.contributor.authorAmendoeira, M. R. R.-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, R. C.-
dc.contributor.authorLangoni, Hélio-
dc.contributor.authorSchubach, T. M. P.-
dc.contributor.authorMenezes, R. C.-
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-18T15:54:08Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T20:28:04Z-
dc.date.available2015-03-18T15:54:08Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T20:28:04Z-
dc.date.issued2014-08-29-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.05.039-
dc.identifier.citationVeterinary Parasitology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 204, n. 3-4, p. 346-351, 2014.-
dc.identifier.issn0304-4017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/116791-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/116791-
dc.description.abstractSince free-range chickens are important for the epidemiology of toxoplasmosis, this study evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of different laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii in these animals. Serum samples from 135 adult domestic chickens were tested for anti-T. gondii antibodies by the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), modified agglutination test (MAT), and indirect hemagglutination test (IHAT). Tissue samples from all animals were analyzed by histopathology, immunohistochemistry and mouse bioassay (gold standard). Fifty-four chickens were positive for T. gondii in the bioassay. The sensitivity and specificity of the different tests were, respectively, 85% and 56% for ELISA; 80% and 52% for IFAT; 76% and 68% for MAT; 61% and 80% for IHAT; 7% and 98% for immunohistochemistry, and 6% and 98% for histopathology. The MAT was the most effective method for the diagnosis of T. gondii infection in chickens, followed by ELISA. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry are useful tools for the diagnosis of T. gondii infection in chickens due to their specificity. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ)-
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)-
dc.format.extent346-351-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectDiagnosisen
dc.subjectToxoplasma gondiien
dc.subjectChickensen
dc.subjectSerologyen
dc.subjectHistopathologyen
dc.subjectImmunohistochemistryen
dc.titleSensitivity and specificity of serological tests, histopathology and immunohistochemistry for detection of Toxoplasma gondii infection in domestic chickensen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionFundacao Oswaldo Cruz-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)-
dc.contributor.institutionInst Nacl Canc-
dc.contributor.institutionMississippi State Univ-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationFundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Inst Nacl Infectol Evandro Chagas, BR-21040360 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationFundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Inst Oswaldo Cruz, BR-21040360 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Fluminense, Inst Biomed, BR-24210130 Niteroi, RJ, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationInst Nacl Canc, BR-20230130 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationMississippi State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Starkville, MS 39762 USA-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Med Vet & Zootecnia, BR-18618970 Botucatu, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Med Vet & Zootecnia, BR-18618970 Botucatu, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPERJ: APQ1 E-26/110.937/2009-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPERJ: APQ1 E-26/111.977/2012-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPERJ: TCT E-26/102.303/2011-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: MCT/CNPq 10/2010-AT-NM-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPERJ: JCNE E-26/102.247/2013-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.05.039-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000341472700037-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofVeterinary Parasitology-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.