You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/116912
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRabelo, Carlos Henrique Silveira-
dc.contributor.authorCosta, A. P.-
dc.contributor.authorRezende, A. V.-
dc.contributor.authorHärter, Carla Joice-
dc.contributor.authorFlorentino, L. A.-
dc.contributor.authorRabelo, F. H. S.-
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-18T15:54:31Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T20:28:22Z-
dc.date.available2015-03-18T15:54:31Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T20:28:22Z-
dc.date.issued2014-01-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN14158-
dc.identifier.citationAnimal Production Science. Collingwood: Csiro Publishing, v. 54, n. 10, p. 1682-1686, 2014.-
dc.identifier.issn1836-0939-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/116912-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/116912-
dc.description.abstractOur objective was to determine the best additive to use for the ensiling of sugarcane SP81-3250 based on the nutritional properties and aerobic stability of the silages. The additives evaluated were (1) and (2): salt (NaCl) at rates of 1.0 or 2.0 kg/100 kg fresh sugarcane (as-is basis), respectively; (3) and (4): quicklime (CaO) at rates of 1.0 or 2.0 kg/100 kg fresh sugarcane, respectively; (5) and (6): commercial inoculants Silobac (R) and Maize All (R); and a control treatment. The addition of quicklime reduced the NDF and ADF contents of the silages by 11% compared with the control treatment, but did not increase the digestibility. On the other hand, after 24 h of in vitro fermentation, the application of 1.0 and 2.0% salt reduced the gas production by 34.15 and 33.55 mL/g OM, respectively, and the IVOMD was reduced 5.74 and 5.90%, respectively, compared with the untreated silage. Moreover, the addition of quicklime elevated the pH of the sugarcane silages, with a trend towards an increase in the DM recovery. In contrast, the bacterial inoculants did not alter the pH values, but there was an upward trend for a DM recovery. After the silos were opened, the silages that were treated with salt (independent of the dose) and 1.0% quicklime exhibited greater stability. We recommend applying 1.0 kg of quicklime to each 100 kg of sugarcane at the time of ensiling to improve the nutritional characteristics of sugarcane silage variety SP81-3250.en
dc.format.extent1682-1686-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherCsiro Publishing-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectanimal nutritionen
dc.subjectdigestibilityen
dc.subjectquicklimeen
dc.subjectLactobacillus spp.en
dc.subjectsodium chlorideen
dc.titleWhat is the best additive to use at the ensiling of sugarcane SP81-3250?en
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Jose do Rosario Vellano-
dc.contributor.institutionCtr Energia Nucl Agr-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Dept Anim Sci, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Jose do Rosario Vellano, Dept Agr, BR-37130000 Alfenas, MG, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationCtr Energia Nucl Agr, BR-13418900 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Dept Anim Sci, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1071/AN14158-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000340723900025-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Production Science-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.