You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/12032
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFranco, J. G.-
dc.contributor.authorMartins, AMVC-
dc.contributor.authorBaruffi, RLR-
dc.contributor.authorMauri, A. L.-
dc.contributor.authorPetersen, C. G.-
dc.contributor.authorFelipe, V-
dc.contributor.authorContart, P.-
dc.contributor.authorPontes, Anaglória-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, JBA-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:35:04Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:52:33Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:35:04Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:52:33Z-
dc.date.issued2004-08-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh308-
dc.identifier.citationHuman Reproduction. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 19, n. 8, p. 1785-1790, 2004.-
dc.identifier.issn0268-1161-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/12032-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/12032-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: the objective of the present study was to determine the importance of the site of embryo transfer (upper or lower half endometrial cavity) on implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. METHODS: A total of 400 transfers guided by ultrasound were randomly assigned to two groups according to the distance between the uterine fundus and the catheter tip at the time of embryo placement. Group I (n=200) consisted of transfers corresponding to a distance of <50% of the endometrial cavity length (ECL), i.e. transfer in upper half of the cavity; and group II (n=200) consisted of transfers corresponding to a distance of greater than or equal to50%, of the ECL, i.e. transfer in lower half of cavity. The Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney test and Fisher's exact test were used where appropriate. RESULTS: the general characteristics of the study population and the main transfer cycle characteristics had an equal distribution (P>0.05) between groups I and II. No significant difference in implantation or pregnancy rates was observed between groups I and II. CONCLUSION: the implantation or pregnancy rates were similar whether the embryos were deposited in the upper or lower half of the endometrial cavity.en
dc.format.extent1785-1790-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherOxford University Press-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectembryo transferpt
dc.subjectendometrial cavity lengthpt
dc.subjectimplantation ratespt
dc.subjectIVFpt
dc.subjectpregnancy ratespt
dc.titleBest site for embryo transfer: the upper or lower half of endometrial cavity?en
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionSinha Junqueira Matern Fdn-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationSinha Junqueira Matern Fdn, Ctr Human Reprod, BR-14085100 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista Julio Mesquita Filho, Fac Med Botucatu, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Botucatu, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista Julio Mesquita Filho, Fac Med Botucatu, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Botucatu, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/humrep/deh308-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000222880300019-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofHuman Reproduction-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.