You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/12192
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCortes-Charry, Rafael-
dc.contributor.authorSalazar, Aleydah-
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Barriola, Victoria-
dc.contributor.authorDabed, Pablo-
dc.contributor.authorFigueira, Lina M.-
dc.contributor.authorMaestá, Izildinha-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:35:26Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:52:50Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:35:26Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:52:50Z-
dc.date.issued2012-07-01-
dc.identifierhttp://www.reproductivemedicine.com/toc/auto_abstract.php?id=23987-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Reproductive Medicine. St Louis: Sci Printers & Publ Inc, v. 57, n. 7-8, p. 329-332, 2012.-
dc.identifier.issn0024-7758-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/12192-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/12192-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical, pathological, immunohistochemical and imaging characteristics of hydatidiform mole in ectopic pregnancy (HMEP) in all the cases admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Caracas (HUC), Central University of Venezuela.STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective and comparative study, based on clinical records review of 2 groups: 10 cases with a diagnosis of HMEP and 20 cases with intrauterine hydatidiform mole (IUHM) admitted to the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of HUC from 1996 to 2010. Clinical, pathological, immunohistochemical and imaging features were analyzed.RESULTS: The prevalence of HMEP in this study was 0.14:1,000 pregnancies; in this group the mean age was 28.8 years, and the mean gestational age at admission was 8.6 weeks. Both groups (HMEP and IUHM) were comparable in these last variables. Abdominal pain and genital bleeding were the most common clinical symptoms in the HMEP group, while it was vaginal bleeding in the IUHM group. Ultrasound findings were similar to those traditionally described in nonmolar ectopic pregnancy. Histology and immunohistochemistry showed that all cases of HMEP were partial mole.CONCLUSION: Although in this study the prevalence of HMEP was high, the size of the sample limits definitive conclusions. This study concludes that all cases of HMEP are partial mole. (J Reprod Med 2012;57:329-332)en
dc.format.extent329-332-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherSci Printers & Publ Inc-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectectopic pregnancyen
dc.subjecthydatidiform moleen
dc.subjecthydatidiform mole, partialen
dc.titleHydatidiform Mole in Ectopic Pregnancy Clinical, Imaging, Pathological and Immunohistochemical Characteristicsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationCent Univ Venezuela, Univ Hosp Caracas, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Caracas, Venezuela-
dc.description.affiliationCent Univ Venezuela, Dept Gynecol Pathol, Anat Pathol Inst Jose A ODaly, Caracas, Venezuela-
dc.description.affiliationUNESP São Paulo State Univ, Botucatu Med Sch, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Trophoblast Dis Ctr, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP São Paulo State Univ, Botucatu Med Sch, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Trophoblast Dis Ctr, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000306533400011-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Reproductive Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.