You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/12250
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaruffi, Ricardo L. R.-
dc.contributor.authorMauri, Ana L.-
dc.contributor.authorPetersen, Claudia G.-
dc.contributor.authorNicoletti, Andreia-
dc.contributor.authorPontes, Anaglória-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Joao Batista A.-
dc.contributor.authorFranco, Jose G.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:35:34Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:35:34Z-
dc.date.issued2009-04-23-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-7-36-
dc.identifier.citationReproductive Biology and Endocrinology. London: Biomed Central Ltd., v. 7, p. 10, 2009.-
dc.identifier.issn1477-7827-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/12250-
dc.description.abstractBackground: It has become an accepted procedure to transfer more than one embryo to the patient to achieve acceptable ongoing pregnancy rates. However, transfers of more than a single embryo increase the probability of establishing a multiple gestation. Single-embryo transfer can minimize twin pregnancies but may also lower live birth rates. This meta-analysis aimed to compare current data on single-embryo versus double-embryo transfer in fresh IVF/ICSI cycles with respect to implantation, ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates.Methods: Search strategies included on-line surveys of databases from 1995 to 2008. Data management and analysis were conducted using the Stats Direct statistical software. The fixed-effect model was used for odds ratio (OR). Fixed-effect effectiveness was evaluated by the Mantel Haenszel method. Seven trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria.Results: When pooling results under the fixed-effect model, the implantation rate was not significantly different between double-embryo transfer (34.5%) and single-embryo transfer group (34.7%) (P = 0.96; OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.78, 1.25). on the other hand, double-embryo transfer produced a statistically significantly higher ongoing clinical pregnancy rate (44.5%) than single-embryo transfer (28.3%) (P < 0.0001; OR: 2.06, 95% CI = 1.64,2.60). At the same time, pooling results presented a significantly higher live birth rate when double-embryo transfer (42.5%) (P < 0.001; OR: 1.87, 95% CI = 1.44,2.42) was compared with single-embryo transfer (28.4%).Conclusion: Meta-analysis with 95% confidence showed that, despite similar implantation rates, fresh double-embryo transfer had a 1.64 to 2.60 times greater ongoing pregnancy rate and 1.44 to 2.42 times greater live birth rate than single-embryo transfer in a population suitable for ART treatment.en
dc.format.extent10-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherBiomed Central Ltd.-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.titleSingle-embryo transfer reduces clinical pregnancy rates and live births in fresh IVF and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) cycles: a meta-analysisen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionCtr Human Reprod Prof Franco Jr-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationCtr Human Reprod Prof Franco Jr, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Botucatu Med Sch, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Botucatu Med Sch, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1477-7827-7-36-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000266491500003-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.fileWOS000266491500003.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofReproductive Biology and Endocrinology-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.