Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/12250
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Baruffi, Ricardo L. R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mauri, Ana L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Petersen, Claudia G. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nicoletti, Andreia | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pontes, Anaglória | - |
dc.contributor.author | Oliveira, Joao Batista A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Franco, Jose G. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-20T13:35:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-05-20T13:35:34Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009-04-23 | - |
dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-7-36 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. London: Biomed Central Ltd., v. 7, p. 10, 2009. | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1477-7827 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/12250 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: It has become an accepted procedure to transfer more than one embryo to the patient to achieve acceptable ongoing pregnancy rates. However, transfers of more than a single embryo increase the probability of establishing a multiple gestation. Single-embryo transfer can minimize twin pregnancies but may also lower live birth rates. This meta-analysis aimed to compare current data on single-embryo versus double-embryo transfer in fresh IVF/ICSI cycles with respect to implantation, ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates.Methods: Search strategies included on-line surveys of databases from 1995 to 2008. Data management and analysis were conducted using the Stats Direct statistical software. The fixed-effect model was used for odds ratio (OR). Fixed-effect effectiveness was evaluated by the Mantel Haenszel method. Seven trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria.Results: When pooling results under the fixed-effect model, the implantation rate was not significantly different between double-embryo transfer (34.5%) and single-embryo transfer group (34.7%) (P = 0.96; OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.78, 1.25). on the other hand, double-embryo transfer produced a statistically significantly higher ongoing clinical pregnancy rate (44.5%) than single-embryo transfer (28.3%) (P < 0.0001; OR: 2.06, 95% CI = 1.64,2.60). At the same time, pooling results presented a significantly higher live birth rate when double-embryo transfer (42.5%) (P < 0.001; OR: 1.87, 95% CI = 1.44,2.42) was compared with single-embryo transfer (28.4%).Conclusion: Meta-analysis with 95% confidence showed that, despite similar implantation rates, fresh double-embryo transfer had a 1.64 to 2.60 times greater ongoing pregnancy rate and 1.44 to 2.42 times greater live birth rate than single-embryo transfer in a population suitable for ART treatment. | en |
dc.format.extent | 10 | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Biomed Central Ltd. | - |
dc.source | Web of Science | - |
dc.title | Single-embryo transfer reduces clinical pregnancy rates and live births in fresh IVF and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) cycles: a meta-analysis | en |
dc.type | outro | - |
dc.contributor.institution | Ctr Human Reprod Prof Franco Jr | - |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | - |
dc.description.affiliation | Ctr Human Reprod Prof Franco Jr, São Paulo, Brazil | - |
dc.description.affiliation | São Paulo State Univ UNESP, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Botucatu Med Sch, São Paulo, Brazil | - |
dc.description.affiliationUnesp | São Paulo State Univ UNESP, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Botucatu Med Sch, São Paulo, Brazil | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/1477-7827-7-36 | - |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000266491500003 | - |
dc.rights.accessRights | Acesso aberto | - |
dc.identifier.file | WOS000266491500003.pdf | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology | - |
Appears in Collections: | Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp |
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.