You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/125689
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLourenço, Marcos Nunes-
dc.contributor.authorSartori, Elisa Mattias-
dc.contributor.authorPadovan, Luis Eduardo Marques-
dc.contributor.authorThomé, Geninho-
dc.contributor.authorFaeda, Rafael Silveira-
dc.contributor.authorMarcantonio Júnior, Elcio-
dc.contributor.authorClaudino, Marcela-
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-06T16:12:50Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T20:53:27Z-
dc.date.available2015-08-06T16:12:50Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T20:53:27Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifierhttp://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_issues&pid=1984-5685&lng=pt&nrm=iso-
dc.identifier.citationRSBO. Revista Sul-Brasileira de Odontologia, v. 10, n. 4, p. 326-334, 2013.-
dc.identifier.issn1984-5685-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/125689-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/125689-
dc.description.abstractThe surface of dental implants is an important factor for osseointegration process and different methods of surface treatment have been described. Objective: To investigate the bone apposition in implant surface treated with sandblasting and acid-etching. Material and methods: Ten rabbits were selected and received one implant treated with method I in the left tibia and one implant treated with method II in the right tibia. Then, twenty implants were divided in two groups, according to methods of sandblasting and acid-etching (method I and method II). After 7, 14, 30, 45 and 60 days, tibias were retrieved and submitted to histotechnical procedures. The percentages of bone–implant contact (BIC) and bone area between threads (BABT) were determined throughout histomorphometric analysis and bone apposition was detected in implants of both groups. Results: In BABT measurements, an increase was observed after 45 and 60 days in the method II, compared to method I and no differences were found after 7, 14 and 30 days. In BIC measurements, an increase was detected with method II at 45 days when compared to method I. No differences between groups in BIC values were observed after 7, 14, 30 and 60 days. Conclusion: Our data demonstrated that implants treated with the method II presented increase in the contact between bone and implant after 45 days compared to method I. Moreover, with concern to bone area between threads, it was observed an increased in the method II after 45 and 60 days. However, both groups can be successfully used as a therapeutic strategy to rehabilitation of edentulous patients. Then, further experiments are needed to evaluate, in depth, the putative differential role of each surface treatment.en
dc.format.extent326-334-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceCurrículo Lattes-
dc.subjectOsseointegrationen
dc.subjectDental implanten
dc.subjectOsteogenesisen
dc.subjectTitaniumen
dc.titleBone apposition and surface treatment in dental implants: histomorphometric pilot evaluation in rabbitsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Camilo Castelo Branco (Unicastelo)-
dc.contributor.institutionInstituto Latino Americano de Pesquisa e Ensino Odontológico (Ilapeo)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Surgery and Implantology, Sagrado Coração University – Bauru – SP – Brazil.-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Diagnóstico e Cirurgia, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara, Araraquara, RUA HUMAITÁ Nº 1680, CENTRO, CEP 14801903, SP, Brasil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Periodontology, Dental School of Araraquara University Center – Araraquara-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofRSBO. Revista Sul-Brasileira de Odontologia-
dc.identifier.lattes6100859465871929-
dc.identifier.lattes4359977455173966-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.