You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/125757
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFais, Laiza Maria Grassi-
dc.contributor.authorMarcelo, Caroline Canhizares-
dc.contributor.authorGuaglianoni, Dalton Geraldo-
dc.contributor.authorPinelli, Lígia Antunes Pereira-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Regina Helena Barbosa Tavares da-
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-06T16:13:02Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T20:53:37Z-
dc.date.available2015-08-06T16:13:02Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T20:53:37Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifierhttp://w2.fop.unicamp.br/brjorals/contents9_1.htm-
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, v. 9, n. 1, p. 39-42, 2010.-
dc.identifier.issn1677-3217-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/125757-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/125757-
dc.description.abstractAim: In this study, a mass-loss method was used to verify whether bovine enamel has the same wear pattern as human enamel in cutting efficiency tests of diamond burs. Methods: Seventy-two teeth were used: 36 human molars (HT) and 36 bovine mandibular central incisors (BT). The enamel of the teeth was cut using diamond bur #1092 attached to a high-speed handpiece under controlled pressure (50-80 g). Each bur (n=12) cut for a total of 72 min, divided into 6 periods of 12 min each (12-min, 24-min, 36-min, 48-min, 60-min, and 72-min). The amount of enamel removed was determined by the difference between pre- and post-cut tooth masses. Results: The mean amounts (g) of enamel removed were: HT- 12-min=0.11; 24-min=0.12; 36-min=0.11; 48-min=0.11; 60-min=0.10; 72-min=0.12; BT- 12-min=0.12; 24-min=0.15; 36-min=0.15; 48- min=0.13; 60-min=0.16; 72-min=0.14. Data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test, and the results showed statistically significant differences between human and bovine teeth (p<0.001) and among the cutting periods (p<0.001).Conclusions: It was concluded that the cutting efficiency of the burs was different between the tested substrates, and that bovine enamel underwent greater mass loss than did human enamel.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)-
dc.format.extent39-42-
dc.language.isopor-
dc.sourceCurrículo Lattes-
dc.subjectTeethen
dc.subjectDental enamelen
dc.subjectCattleen
dc.subjectEfficiencyen
dc.subjectDiamonden
dc.titleHuman teeth versus bovine teeth: cutting effectiviness of diamond bursen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Materiais Odontológicos e Prótese, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara, Araraquara, Rua Humaitá, 1680, CENTRO, CEP 14801903, SP, Brasil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Materiais Odontológicos e Prótese, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara, Araraquara, Rua Humaitá, 1680, CENTRO, CEP 14801903, SP, Brasil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University, Mathematics and Statistics Department, Araraquara Science and Language School, Brazil-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2002/10781-5-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.fileISSN1677-3217-2010-09-01-39-42.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences-
dc.identifier.lattes1778542696342978-
dc.identifier.lattes0455968557454133-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.