You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/125816
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCurylofo, Fabiana de Almeida-
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, Lígia Araújo-
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Ana Lúcia Roselino-
dc.contributor.authorFais, Laiza Maria Grassi-
dc.contributor.authorVaz, Luis Geraldo-
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-06T16:13:11Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T20:53:44Z-
dc.date.available2015-08-06T16:13:11Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T20:53:44Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifierhttp://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-56852013000100014&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=en-
dc.identifier.citationRSBO. Revista Sul-Brasileira de Odontologia, v. 10, n. 1, p. 82-88, 2013.-
dc.identifier.issn1984-5685-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/125816-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/125816-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to review the literature on the systems used to decontaminate the implant's surface. Different instruments have been proposed, but there is no agreement in the literature about which methods would be more efficient with no damage to the implant surface. It was reported the use of plastic, carbon fiber, stainless-steel and titanium curettes and also the use of other systems such as ultrasonic points with different tips, rubber cups and air abrasion. Literature review: In most of the studies, the injury caused on the titanium surface at the time of instrumentation was examined. In others, the cell adhesion on the titanium dental implants following instrumentation of the implant surface was observed. Moreover, to enhance cleaning around implants, ultrasonic systems were recently tested. Conclusion: Metal instruments can lead to major damage to implant surface, therefore, they are not indicated for decontamination of dental implants surfaces. Furthermore, non-metallic instruments, such as plastic curettes, rubber cups, air abrasion and some ultrasonic systems seem to be better choices to remove calculus and plaque of the sub- and supra-gingival peri-implant area. It is noteworthy that more studies evaluating the effects of these systems are required to establish best practices to be used in the treatment of patients with dental implants.en
dc.format.extent82-88-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceCurrículo Lattes-
dc.subjectDental implantsen
dc.subjectInstrumentationen
dc.subjectPrevention and controlen
dc.titleInstrumentation of dental implants: a literature reviewen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Materiais Odontológicos e Prótese, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara, Araraquara, Rua Humaitá, 1680 - Sala 409 - Quarto Andar, Centro, CEP 14801903, SP, Brasil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Materiais Odontológicos e Prótese, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara, Araraquara, Rua Humaitá, 1680 - Sala 409 - Quarto Andar, Centro, CEP 14801903, SP, Brasil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University – Araraquara – SP – Brazil.-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.relation.ispartofRSBO. Revista Sul-Brasileira de Odontologia-
dc.identifier.lattes8547747556446020-
dc.identifier.lattes6227346732067001-
dc.identifier.lattes8787696766930781-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.