You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNacanichi, Renata do Amaral-
dc.contributor.authorTonetto, Mateus Rodrigues-
dc.contributor.authorBandéca, Matheus Coelho-
dc.contributor.authorAndrade, Marcelo Ferrarezi de-
dc.contributor.authorSegalla, José Cláudio Martins-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Monica Barros-
dc.contributor.authorBhandi, Shilpa H.-
dc.contributor.authorPedro, Fábio Luiz Miranda-
dc.contributor.authorElossais, André Afif-
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, v. 16, n. 3, p. 167-171, 2015.-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was evaluate the dental enamel after whitening treatment with Opalescence Boost PF® 38%, correlating the structural alterations in the surface of the enamel with its respective pH and verify if whitened teeth submitted to different finishing and polishing techniques show similar surface texture to healthy teeth (control group). Sixty premolars were divided in 6 groups (n = 10), which had been immersed in artificial saliva during all the experiment. Protocol whitening was performed according to the manufacturer recommendations, and then the specimens were submitted to different polishing technique with Sof-Lex Pop On® disks, Flex Diamond® felt disks using two different micrometric polishing pastes (Enamelize® and Diamond Polish®) and two nanometric polishing pastes (Lummina-E Diamond and Lummina-E Alumina), according to the groups. Representative specimens were analyzed in scanning electronic microscopy (SEM). Whitening gel used in this experiment had modified the morphologic aspect of the enamel surface. It was found that two nanometric polishing pastes (G5 and G6) promoted a less rough surface compared to control group even after the whitening process.en
dc.sourceCurrículo Lattes-
dc.subjectDental enamelen
dc.subjectSurface propertiesen
dc.titleInfluence of standard load micro and nanopatterned in surface roughness of bleached teeth and submitted to different surface treatments?en
dc.contributor.institutionCentro Universitário da Grande Dourados (UNIGRAN)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de Cuiabá (UNIC)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Ceuma-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionRamaiah Dental College and Hospital-
dc.description.affiliationCentro Universitário da Grande Dourados, Departamento de Odontologia-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade de Cuiabá, Departamento de Ciências Odontológias Integradas-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Ceuma, Departamento de Odontologia-
dc.description.affiliationRamaiah Dental College and Hospital, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.relation.ispartofThe Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.