You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/127339
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFeitoza, Christiane Cavalcante-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de-
dc.contributor.authorConsani, Rafael Leonardo Xediek-
dc.contributor.authorBoeck, Eloisa Marcantonio-
dc.contributor.authorPizzol, Karina Eiras Dela Coleta-
dc.contributor.authorLunardi, Nadia-
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-26T19:19:15Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T20:57:08Z-
dc.date.available2015-08-26T19:19:15Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T20:57:08Z-
dc.date.issued2015-03-01-
dc.identifierhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-32252015000100001&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en-
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, v. 14, n. 1, p. 01-04, 2015.-
dc.identifier.issn1677-3225-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/127339-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/127339-
dc.description.abstractOrthodontic mini-implants are used in clinical practice to provide efficient and aesthetically-pleasing anchorage. AIM: To evaluate the hardness Vickers hardness and chemical composition of mini-implant titanium alloys from five commercial brands. METHODS: Thirty self-drilling mini-implants, six each from the following commercial brands, were used: Neodent NEO, Morelli MOR, Sin SIN, Conexão CON, and Rocky Mountain RMO. The hardness and chemical composition of the titanium alloys were performed by the Vickers hardness test and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, respectively. RESULTS: Vickers hardness was significantly higher in SIN implants than in NEO, MOR, and CON implants. Similarly, VH was significantly higher in RMO implants than in MOR and NEO ones. In addition, VH was higher in CON implants than in NEO ones. There were no significant differences in the proportions of titanium and aluminum in the mini-implant alloy of the five commercial brands. Conversely, the proportion of vanadium differed significantly between CON and MOR/NEO implants. CONCLUSIONS: Mini-implants of different brands presented distinct properties of hardness and composition of the alloy.en
dc.format.extent1-4-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherFaculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP-
dc.sourceSciELO-
dc.subjectOrthodonticsen
dc.subjectDental materialsen
dc.subjectHardnessen
dc.titleChemical analysis and Vickers hardness of orthodontic mini-implantsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionCentro Universitário de Araraquara (UNIARA)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)-
dc.description.affiliationCentro Universitário de Araraquara Department of Dentistry-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista Araraquara Dental School Department of Diagnosis and Surgery-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Piracicaba Dental School Department of Oral Rehabilitation-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista Araraquara Dental School Department of Diagnosis and Surgery-
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-3225v14n1a01-
dc.identifier.scieloS1677-32252015000100001-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.fileS1677-32252015000100001.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.