You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/128913
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorScaramucci, Tais-
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Alessandra Bühler-
dc.contributor.authorLippert, Frank-
dc.contributor.authorZero, Domenick T.-
dc.contributor.authorHara, Anderson T.-
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-21T13:15:31Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T21:06:27Z-
dc.date.available2015-10-21T13:15:31Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T21:06:27Z-
dc.date.issued2015-02-01-
dc.identifierhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25864237-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal Of Dentistry. Weston: Mosher &linder, Inc, v. 28, n. 1, p. 18-22, 2015.-
dc.identifier.issn0894-8275-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/128913-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/128913-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the ability of calcium-containing prescription-strength fluoride (F) toothpastes in preventing enamel erosion under low salivary flow simulating conditions. Methods: Enamel and dentin bovine specimens were assigned to the following groups: A - placebo; B - 1,100 ppm F/NaF (Aquafresh Advanced); C - 5,000 ppm F/NaF (Prevident 5000 Booster); D - 5000 ppm F/NaF+calcium sodium phosphosilicate (Topex Renew); and E - 5,000 ppm F/NaF+tri-calcium phosphate (Clinpro 5000). Specimens were positioned in custom-made devices, creating a sealed chamber on the surface, connected to peristaltic pumps. Citric acid was injected into the chamber for 2 minutes, followed by artificial saliva (0.05 ml/minute), for 60 minutes, 4x/day, for 3 days. Aquafresh was also tested under normal salivary flow (0.5 ml/minute), as reference (Group F). Specimens were exposed to the toothpastes for 2 minutes, 2x/day. After cycling, surface loss (SL) and concentration of loosely- and firmly-bound F were determined. Data were analyzed by ANOVA. Results: Group A (placebo) presented highest surface loss (SL), while Group F had the lowest, for both substrates. For enamel, none of the dentifrices differed from Group B or among each other. For dentin, none of the dentifrices differed from Group B, but Group E showed greater protection than Group C. Group E presented the highest F concentrations for both substrates, only matched by Group D for firmly-bound fluoride on enamel. All fluoridated dentifrices tested reduced SL, with no additional benefit from higher F concentrations. Some formulations, especially Clinpro 5000, increased F availability on the dental substrates, but no further erosion protection was observed.en
dc.format.extent18-22-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherMosher &linder, Inc-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.titleIn vitro effect of calcium-containing prescription-strength fluoride toothpastes on bovine enamel erosion under hyposalivation-simulating conditionsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionIndiana University-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto-
dc.description.affiliationIndiana University, Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, School of Dentistry-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia de São José dos Campos-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000350518300004-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal Of Dentistry-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.