You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMurate, Leticia S.-
dc.contributor.authorPaiao, Fernanda G.-
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, Adriana M. de-
dc.contributor.authorBerchieri, Angelo-
dc.contributor.authorShimokomaki, Massami-
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Poultry Science. Tsukuba: Japan Poultry Science Assoc, v. 52, n. 1, p. 52-56, 2015.-
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dietary prebiotic, probiotic, and symbiotic products for controlling infection in laying hens and broiler chickens challenged with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (SE). These products could replace the use of antibiotics, which would avoid the problem of hastening antimicrobial resistance for both types of birds. Salmonella-free 1-day-old (1-d-old) layers chicks and broilers chicks were inoculated with SE resistant to nalidixic acid and spectinomycin (SE Nai(r) Spec(r)) and divided into four groups: 1) control (without feed additives); 2) probiotic (Bacillus subtilis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. casei, Enterococcus faecium, Bifidobacterium longum); 3) prebiotic (inulin, fructooligosaccharide, mannanoligosaccharide, and oligosaccharide); and 4) synbiotic (85% of the probiotic + 15% of the prebiotic additives). The presence of SE Nal(r) Spec(r) in cloacal swabs was analyzed at 7, 14, and 21 days post-infection (dpi) in laying hens and broilers. The number of SE Nai(r) Spec(r). per gram of cecal contents was determined at 7, 14, and 21 dpi in laying hens and at 2, 5, 7, 14, and 21 dpi in broilers. The results showed that the prebiotic additive reduced the occurrence of SE in cloacal swabs from laying hens but not from broilers. In the groups of laying hens and broilers that received prebiotics, the isolation and counts of SE Nair Specr were lower during the first week post-infection but not throughout the experiment. The probiotic and synbiotic additives did not influence the SE infection in laying hens and broilers; in contrast prebiotics had a protective effect during the first week post-infection.en
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)-
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)-
dc.publisherJapan Poultry Science Assoc-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectPathogenic bacteriaen
dc.titleEfficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on laying hens and broilers challenged with salmonella enteritidisen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual de Londrina, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Londrina, PR, Brasil-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR), Londrina, PR, Brasil-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Departamento de Patologia Veterinária, Jaboticabal, SP, Brasil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Departamento de Patologia Veterinária, Jaboticabal, SP, Brasil-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 475503/2009-0-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCAPES: 23038007638201119-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Poultry Science-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.