Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/129413
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Costa Gomes, Lucas Vinicius | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zanetti Lopes, Welber Daniel | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cruz, Breno Cayeiro | - |
dc.contributor.author | Teixeira, Weslen Fabricio | - |
dc.contributor.author | Felippelli, Gustavo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Maciel, Willian G. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bichuette, Murilo Abud | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ruivo, Maycon A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Alcantara Colli, Marcos Henrique | - |
dc.contributor.author | Carvalho, Rafael Silveira | - |
dc.contributor.author | Martinez, Antonio Campanha | - |
dc.contributor.author | Soares, Vando Edesio | - |
dc.contributor.author | Costa, Alvimar Jose da | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-10-21T21:02:45Z | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-10-25T21:09:07Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-10-21T21:02:45Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-10-25T21:09:07Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-06-01 | - |
dc.identifier | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014489415000351 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Experimental Parasitology. San Diego: Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science, v. 153, p. 22-28, 2015. | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0014-4894 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/129413 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/129413 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The present study aimed to evaluate the acaricidal efficacy of fluazuron (2.5 mg/kg), administered as a pour-on, in comparison to an injectable formulation containing fluazuron (1.6 mg/kg) + ivermectin (0.63 mg/kg), against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in naturally and experimentally infested cattle. Two studies were conducted with different tick strains, one with artificial infestations (Stall Test, using leight animals per group) and one with natural infestations (utilizing ten animals per group): In both studies, the animals were randomized, according to average tick counts performed on days -3, -2 and -1, into four groups: T01, negative control (saline solution); T02, pour-on fluazuron (2.5 mg/kg); T03: subcutaneous fluazuron (1.6 mg/kg) + ivermectin (0.63 mg/kg); and T04 subcutaneous ivermectin (0.63 mg/kg). Based on obtained results, and considering the utilized tick strains, it was possible to conclude that the pour-on fluazuron (2.5 mg/kg) formulation demonstrated high acaricidal efficacy, with protection periods ranging from 49 to 77 days against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. On the other hand, for the injectable fluazuron (1.6 mg/kg) + ivermectin (0.63 mg/kg) formulation, it was not possible to observe elevated anti-R. (B.) microplus effect on both artificial and experimental infestation studies. Results observed for this combination were similar or inferior to those obtained by subcutaneous ivermectin (0.63 mg/kg). Future studies with this formulation containing fluazuron (1.6 mg/kg) + ivermectin (0.63 mg/kg), regarding pharmacokinetic and/or bioavailability profiles, or even studies analyzing both this active principles separately, are needed, seeking to better understand the effects of such combination against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus parasitizing cattle. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | en |
dc.format.extent | 22-28 | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier B.V. | - |
dc.source | Web of Science | - |
dc.subject | Engorged females | en |
dc.subject | Fluazuron | en |
dc.subject | Injectable route | en |
dc.subject | Ivermectin | en |
dc.subject | Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus | en |
dc.title | Acaricidal effects of fluazuron (2.5 mg/kg) and a combination of fluazuron (1.6 mg/kg) + ivermectin (0.63 mg/kg), administered at different routes, against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus parasitizing cattle | en |
dc.type | outro | - |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | - |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) | - |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) | - |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Camilo Castelo Branco (Unicastelo) | - |
dc.description.affiliation | Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Regional de Jataí, BR-364 Km 192, Parque Industrial, Jataí, GO 75801-615, Brasil | - |
dc.description.affiliation | Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM), Campus Regional de Umuarama, Rodov. PR 489, n° 1.400 | - |
dc.description.affiliation | Universidade Camilo Castelo Branco (Unicastelo), Av. Hilário da Silva Passo 950, Descalvado, SP 13690-970, Brasil. | - |
dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, UNESP/CPPAR, Via de acesso prof. Paulo Donatto Castellani, s/n CEP:14884-900, Jaboticabal, São Paulo-Brazil | - |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2015.02.004 | - |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000354756000004 | - |
dc.rights.accessRights | Acesso restrito | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Experimental Parasitology | - |
Appears in Collections: | Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp |
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.