You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/13027
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLima, Flávio de Oliveira-
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, Joaquim Soares de-
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Henrique de Oliveira-
dc.contributor.authorPinheiro, Nathanael F.-
dc.contributor.authorOshima, Celina Tizuko-
dc.contributor.authorFranco, Marcello F. de-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:37:35Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:54:14Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:37:35Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:54:14Z-
dc.date.issued2011-06-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1179/2046023611Y.0000000001-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Histotechnology. Leeds: Maney Publishing, v. 34, n. 2, p. 69-73, 2011.-
dc.identifier.issn0147-8885-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/13027-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/13027-
dc.description.abstractThe tissue microarray (TMA) technique allows multiple tissue samples in a single block. Commercial adhesive tape is used to avoid the loss of tissue samples during the immunostaining process. Few reports exist in the literature comparing the use of these adhesive tapes to other adhesive techniques. The objective of this study was to compare loss of sections adhered to slides using commercial adhesive tapes versus using silanized only slides. TMA was constructed with varying tissues using a fixed-base device (Beecher Instruments), placing 108 cylinders of 1 mm diameter in duplicate, spaced 1.2 mm apart. Section of 4 mu m were cut from the TMA block and adhered to 30 silanized slides and 30 commercial glass slides using adhesive tape, according to manufacturer's recommendations. Vimentin immunoexpression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Antigenic recovery was realized in citrate buffer using a microwave oven. Cylinder loss in the immunohistochemical process was quantified and expressed as: total (>80%), almost complete (75-79%), or partial (50-74%). The commercial adhesive tape group presented lesser total loss (1.1 versus 6.4%), almost complete loss (2.2 versus 3.5%), and partial loss (2.1 versus 3.8%) than the silanized slide group (ANOVA, P < 0.05). The sum of total and almost complete losses in the silanized slide group was 9.9%, greater than the losses in slides using commercial adhesive tapes (3.3%) and less than reported and considered acceptable in the literature (10-30%). In conclusion, the use of silanized only slides presents very satisfactory results, requires less training, and reduces costs significantly, thus justifying their use in research.en
dc.format.extent69-73-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherManey Publishing-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectImmunohistochemistryen
dc.subjectSample lossesen
dc.subjectTissue microarrayen
dc.titleLoss of samples in the tissue microarray technique: comparison between slides using adhesive tape and silanized slidesen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Pathol, Botucatu Med Sch, BR-18618000 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationFed Univ São Paulo UNIFESP, Dept Pathol, Escola Paulista Med, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Pathol, Botucatu Med Sch, BR-18618000 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1179/2046023611Y.0000000001-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000293082000003-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Histotechnology-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.