You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/131617
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPellizzer, Eduardo Piza-
dc.contributor.authorMello, Caroline Cantieri de-
dc.contributor.authorSantiago Junior, Joel Ferreira-
dc.contributor.authorSouza Batista, Victor Eduardo de-
dc.contributor.authorde Faria Almeida, Daniel Augusto-
dc.contributor.authorVerri, Fellippo Ramos-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-07T15:38:46Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T21:23:58Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-07T15:38:46Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T21:23:58Z-
dc.date.issued2015-10-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.05.024-
dc.identifier.citationMaterials Science & Engineering. C, Materials For Biological Applications, v. 55, p. 187-192, 2015.-
dc.identifier.issn1873-0191-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/131617-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/131617-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to analyze the stress distribution of short implants supporting single unit or splinted crowns by the photo-elasticity method. Four photo-elastic models were produced: A (3.75×7mm); B (3.75×7mm, 3.75×7mm and 3.75×7mm); C (3.75×10mm, 3.75×7mm and 3.75×7mm); D (3.75×13mm, 3.75×7mm and 3.75×7mm). The prostheses were made with Ni-Cr alloy. A load of 100N in the axial and oblique directions was applied, totaling 380 applications, individually capturing their images in each model. The data were randomized and analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively by 2 examiners. The oblique loading was significantly more damaging. The increase in length was favorable for stress distribution (p<0.05). The splinting was beneficial for the transmission of stresses mainly (p<0.05). The splinting of the crowns, as well as increasing the length of the first implant and axial loading was most beneficial in the stress distribution. Short splinted implants behaved better than single unit implants. Increasing of the length of the first implant significantly improved the stress distribution in all analyzed situations.en
dc.format.extent187-192-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier B. V.-
dc.sourcePubMed-
dc.subjectDental implantsen
dc.subjectDental prosthesis, implant-supporteden
dc.subjectDental stress analysisen
dc.titleAnalysis of the biomechanical behavior of short implants: the photo-elasticity methoden
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade do Sagrado Coração (USC)-
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Sacred Heart — USC, Department of Health Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespAraçatuba Dental School, UNESP — Univ Estadual Paulista, Campus of Araçatuba, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.msec.2015.05.024-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofMaterials Science & Engineering. C, Materials For Biological Applications-
dc.identifier.pubmed26117754-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.