You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/131642
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChatila, Sami-
dc.contributor.authorAmparo, Maura R.-
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Lucas S.-
dc.contributor.authorPenteado, Eduardo D.-
dc.contributor.authorTomita, Inês N.-
dc.contributor.authorSantos-Neto, Álvaro J.-
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Paulo C. F. Lima-
dc.contributor.authorZaiat, Marcelo-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-07T15:39:20Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T21:24:02Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-07T15:39:20Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T21:24:02Z-
dc.date.issued2015-10-14-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2015.1088072-
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Technology, p. 1-7, 2015.-
dc.identifier.issn0959-3330-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/131642-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/131642-
dc.description.abstractThe antibiotics sulfamethoxazole (SMTX) and ciprofloxacin (CIP) are commonly used in human and veterinary medicine, which explains their occurrence in wastewater. Anaerobic reactors are low-cost, simple and suitable technology to wastewater treatment, but there is a lack of studies related to the removal efficiency of antibiotics. To overcome this knowledge gap, the objective of this study was to evaluate the removal kinetics of SMTX and CIP using a horizontal-flow anaerobic immobilized biomass reactor. Two different concentrations were evaluated, for SMTX 20 and 40 μg L(-1); for CIP 2.0 and 5.0 μg L(-1). The affluent and effluent analysis was carried out in liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) with the sample preparation procedure using an off-line solid-phase extraction. This method was developed, validated and successfully applied for monitoring the affluent and effluent samples. The removal efficiency found for both antibiotics at the two concentrations studied was 97%. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) exhibited kinetic constants that were different from that observed for the antibiotics, indicating the absence of co-metabolism. Also, though the antibiotic concentration was increased, there was no inhibitory effect in the removal of COD and antibiotics.en
dc.format.extent1-7-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherEnvironmental Technology-
dc.sourcePubMed-
dc.subjectLc-ms/ms analysisen
dc.subjectSulfamethoxazoleen
dc.subjectCiprofloxacinen
dc.subjectHorizontal-flow anaerobic immobilized biomass reactoren
dc.subjectRemoval kineticsen
dc.titleSulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin removal using a horizontal-flow anaerobic immobilized biomass reactoren
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationa Biological Processes Laboratory, Center for Research, Development and Innovation in Environmental Engineering, São Carlos School of Engineering (EESC) , University of São Paulo (USP), Environmental Engineering , Santa Angelina, São Carlos, Brazil.-
dc.description.affiliationb Institute of Chemistry of Sao Carlos, University of São Paulo , São Carlos, Brazil.-
dc.description.affiliationc Department of Analytical Chemistry , Institute of Chemistry, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP , Araraquara , São Paulo , Brazil.-
dc.description.affiliationUnespc Department of Analytical Chemistry , Institute of Chemistry, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP , Araraquara , São Paulo , Brazil.-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09593330.2015.1088072-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Technology-
dc.identifier.pubmed26465824-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.