You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/132313
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSassaki, C. Y.-
dc.contributor.authorColodel, M. M.-
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, I.-
dc.contributor.authorNogueira, F. S.-
dc.contributor.authorLucheis, Simone Baldini-
dc.contributor.authorLangoni, Hélio-
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Noeme Sousa-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:26:00Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T21:25:32Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:26:00Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T21:25:32Z-
dc.date.issued2011-09-19-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-91992011000300015-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Venomous Animals and Toxins Including Tropical Diseases, v. 17, n. 3, p. 348-352, 2011.-
dc.identifier.issn1678-9180-
dc.identifier.issn1678-9199-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/132313-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/132313-
dc.description.abstractUninfected dogs (n = 10) and those naturally infected with leishmaniasis (n = 10) were subjected to several diagnostic tests, namely: hemoculture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of hemoculture, indirect immunofuorescence (RIFI), cytological examination of lymph node aspirate, culture of lymph node aspirate and PCR of lymph node aspirate. RIFI - followed by PCR of lymph node aspirate culture - presented more positive results in infected dogs than in uninfected ones. In infected animals, RIFI was more efective than PCR of lymph node aspirate culture. There was no statistical diference in positivity between RIFI and hemoculture; lymph node aspirate culture/cytological examination of lymph node aspirate and PCR of hemoculture; and between PCR of lymph node aspirate culture and PCR of hemoculture. All infected and uninfected animals had positive and negative results in at least one test. In conclusion, the association of several tests improves the efcacy of canine visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)-
dc.description.sponsorshipFort Dodge Animal Health-
dc.format.extent348-352-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Centro de Estudos de Venenos e Animais Peçonhentos (CEVAP)-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectDiagnosis-
dc.subjectDogs-
dc.subjectVisceral leishmaniasis-
dc.subjectAnimal experiment-
dc.subjectAnimal parasitosis-
dc.subjectAspiration cytology-
dc.subjectBlood culture-
dc.subjectControlled study-
dc.subjectDiagnostic test-
dc.subjectDifferential diagnosis-
dc.subjectDog-
dc.subjectImmunofluorescence-
dc.subjectLaboratory diagnosis-
dc.subjectLeishmania-
dc.subjectLymph node biopsy-
dc.subjectNonhuman-
dc.subjectPolymerase chain reaction-
dc.subjectVisceral leishmaniasis-
dc.subjectAnimalia-
dc.subjectCanis familiaris-
dc.titleComparison of diferent diagnostic tests in dogs uninfected and naturally infected with visceral leishmaniasisen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionEducational Foundation of Andradina (FEA)-
dc.contributor.institutionAgência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Medicine School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry Sao Paulo State University (Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)), Botucatu, Sao Paulo State-
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Veterinary Medicine Educational Foundation of Andradina (FEA), Andradina, Sao Paulo State-
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo Agency of Agribusiness Technology (APTA), Bauru, Sao Paulo State-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Veterinary Hygiene and Public Health School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry Sao Paulo State University (Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)), Botucatu, Sao Paulo State-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Medicine School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry Sao Paulo State University (Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)), Botucatu, Sao Paulo State-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Veterinary Hygiene and Public Health School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry Sao Paulo State University (Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)), Botucatu, Sao Paulo State-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2005/56765-9-
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1678-91992011000300015-
dc.identifier.scieloS1678-91992011000300015-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000294438900014-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.fileS1678-91992011000300015-en.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Venomous Animals and Toxins Including Tropical Diseases-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-80052735361-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.