You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/134640
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Sergio Tosi-
dc.contributor.authorJardim, Juliana Gomes-
dc.contributor.authorSiqueira, Natalia Silva-
dc.contributor.authorZago, Paula Fávaro Polastri-
dc.contributor.authorAguiar, Stefane Aline-
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-02T12:57:46Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T21:30:51Z-
dc.date.available2016-03-02T12:57:46Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T21:30:51Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifierhttp://socibracom.com/bjmb/index.php/bjmb/article/view/24-
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian Journal of Motor Behavior, v. 6, n. 1, p. 7-15, 2011.-
dc.identifier.issn1980-5586-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/134640-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/134640-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the present study was to analyze the effects of looking at targets located at different distances on body oscillation during tasks of distinct difficulties. In Experiment 1, ten participants in quiet stance fixated targets in three conditions: No object-far (fixation on far-target without near-target), Object-near (fixation on near target with fartarget), and Object-far (fixation on far-target with near-target). Mean oscillations of trunk in anterior-posterior axis were smallest in the Object-near condition; the No object-far and Object-far conditions were similar. In Experiment 2, seven participants in kiba-dachi, a karate stance, were submitted to three conditions: Blindfolded, No object-far, and Object-near. Mean oscillations of head and trunk in anterior-posterior axis were smaller in the Object-near as compared to blindfolded condition; trunk oscillated more during No object-far than Object-near condition. The results support the notion that a simple posture is not automatically regulated by the optical flow, but different amounts of visual instability may be tolerated according to the fixation distance, regardless the presence of non-fixated objects; the control of a more difficult posture may also accommodate the effects of fixation distance.en
dc.format.extent07-15-
dc.language.isopor-
dc.sourceCurrículo Lattes-
dc.subjectPostural controlpt
dc.subjectStabilization of lookingpt
dc.subjectVisual informationpt
dc.subjectSuprapostural taskpt
dc.titleEstabilização postural do olhar: efeitos da distância do objetopt
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Educação Física, Faculdade de Ciências de Bauru, Bauru, Av. Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube, S/N, Vargem Limpa, CEP 17033360, SP, Brasil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Educação Física, Faculdade de Ciências de Bauru, Bauru, Av. Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube, S/N, Vargem Limpa, CEP 17033360, SP, Brasil-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.fileISSN1980-5586-2011-06-01-07-15.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Journal of Motor Behavior-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2007-5950pt
dc.identifier.lattes0184563925177710-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.