You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/135670
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMariano, Enzo Barberio-
dc.contributor.authorReinas, Rafael Iglesias-
dc.contributor.authorSobreiro, Vinicius Amorim-
dc.contributor.authorRebelatto, Daisy Aparecida do Nascimento-
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-02T13:03:58Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T21:33:12Z-
dc.date.available2016-03-02T13:03:58Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T21:33:12Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1504/LAJMSD.2014.065473-
dc.identifier.citationLatin American J. of Management for Sustainable Development, v. 1, n. 2/3, p. 164, 2014.-
dc.identifier.issn2052-0336-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/135670-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/135670-
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this paper is to present a benefit-cost ranking of 127 civil transport aircraft; this ranking was determined considering a new data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach, called triple index, which combines three assessment methods: 1) standard frontier, 2) inverted index; 3) cross-multiplicative index. The analysis used the following inputs: a) market price; b) direct operating costs; and as outputs: a) payload, b) cruise speed; c) maximum rate of climb with a single engine. To ensure the homogeneity of the units, the aircrafts were divided according to the propulsion system (jet and turboprop) and size (regional, narrow-body and wide-body); they were also evaluated according to different ranges in order to identify the aircraft with the best cost-benefit relationship for each option.en
dc.format.extent164-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceCurrículo Lattes-
dc.subjectData envelopment analysisen
dc.subjectDEAen
dc.subjectCost-benefit analysisen
dc.subjectAircraften
dc.subjectTriple indexen
dc.subjectSustainabilityen
dc.titleAircraft selection with DEA's triple index: an approach for sustainabilityen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de Brasília (UnB)-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Engenharia de Produção, Faculdade de Engenharia de Bauru, Bauru, Avenida Engenheiro Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01, Núcleo Residencial Presidente Geisel, CEP 17033360, SP, Brasil-
dc.description.affiliationProduction Engineering Department, São Paulo State University, Av. Eng. Luiz Edmundo C. Coube 14-01, Bauru, São Paulo, 17033-360, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationProduction Engineering Department, School of Engineering of São Carlos, University of São Paulo – USP, Av. Trabalhador São Carlense 400, São Carlos, São Paulo, 13566-590, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Management, Faculty of Economics, Management and Accounting – FACE, University of Brasília – UnB, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, Federal District 70910-900, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Engenharia de Produção, Faculdade de Engenharia de Bauru, Bauru, Avenida Engenheiro Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01, Núcleo Residencial Presidente Geisel, CEP 17033360, SP, Brasil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1504/LAJMSD.2014.065473-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofLatin American J. of Management for Sustainable Development-
dc.identifier.lattes6639164567036709-
dc.identifier.lattes3150339971293179-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.