You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/135758
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSpigolon, Luciana Gasparelo-
dc.contributor.authorBezerra, Barbara Stolte-
dc.contributor.authorBastos, Jorge Tiago-
dc.contributor.authorFerraz, Antonio Clovis Pinto-
dc.contributor.authorBattistelle, Rosane Aparecida Gomes-
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-02T13:04:17Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T21:33:25Z-
dc.date.available2016-03-02T13:04:17Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T21:33:25Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2238-1031.jtl.v9n4a1-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Transport Literature, v. 9, n. 4, p. 5-9, 2015.-
dc.identifier.issn2238-1031-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/135758-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/135758-
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this paper is compare the common traffic lights (CTL) to three different types of traffic lights with countdown displays (SCD) and assess their effects on road safety and capacity. This comparison is required because the results found in the literature are divergent among countries and cities, and one of the SCD analyzed in our study is different from the SCD used worldwide. An observational before-after study was conducted to evaluate the safety and capacity in a period of one year before and one year after the implementation of the SCD in three Brazilian cities. The results indicate that the SCD models 1 and 3 had around 35%±14% reduction in the total number of accidents; the model 2, does not have significant reduction. In order to perform the capacity analysis a framework for data collection and an adaptation for estimation of initial lost time in each phase were developed. Considering the capacity analysis there was a reduction around 11% in the lost time in SCD model 1, 7% in SCD model 2 and 3% in SCD model 3. However the implications of this on capacity are trifle due to a small increase in the average headways for all SCD models compare to CTL.en
dc.format.extent5-9-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceCurrículo Lattes-
dc.subjectBefore-after studyen
dc.subjectTraffic lightsen
dc.subjectCountdown time devicesen
dc.subjectTraffic safetyen
dc.titleComparison between common traffic lights and three types of traffic lights with visual cycle a safety and capacity analysisen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Engenharia Civil, Faculdade de Engenharia de Bauru, Bauru, Av. Eng. Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01, Vargem Limpa, CEP 17033360, SP, Brasil-
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Engenharia Civil, Faculdade de Engenharia de Bauru, Bauru, Av. Eng. Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01, Vargem Limpa, CEP 17033360, SP, Brasil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/2238-1031.jtl.v9n4a1-
dc.identifier.scieloS2238-10312015000400005-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.fileS2238-10312015000400005.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Transport Literature-
dc.identifier.lattes2856867993043170-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.