You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/137055
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMillen, Danilo Domingues-
dc.contributor.authorPacheco, Rodrigo Dias Lauritano-
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Paula M.-
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Paulo Henrique Mazza-
dc.contributor.authorArrigoni, Mário de Beni-
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-01T18:43:58Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T21:36:27Z-
dc.date.available2016-04-01T18:43:58Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T21:36:27Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2527/af.2011-0017-
dc.identifier.citationAnimal Frontiers: the review magazine of animal agriculture, v. 1, n. 2, p. 46-52, 2011.-
dc.identifier.issn2160-6056-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/137055-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/137055-
dc.description.abstractBrazil is the world's largest beef exporter with the world's largest commercial cattle herd; however, the production cycle needs to be more efficient to supply internal and external demands in the future. Feedlot operations are currently a reality for the Brazilian beef cattle industry; nonetheless the beef cattle industry in Brazil is still based on grass-fed animals in which the Nellore breed predominates. At some point this constitutes an important advantage for Brazilian beef exportations because some countries look for “natural beef.” Brazilian packing plants regulate the use of antibiotics, especially ionophores used as growth promoters, on farms certified to export beef to European countries. In addition, the use of any implant or beta-agonist for cattle is forbidden in Brazil. From 1970 to 2006, the Brazilian bovine herd increased at 2.04%/year, total pasture at 0.07%/year, area with cultivated pasture at 3.5%/year, and ratio of animals/hectare of total pasture at 1.97%/year, whereas the area with natural pasture decreased at 2.26%/year. These trends alleviate some of the pressure on Brazilian authorities with respect to deforestation of the Amazon forest. Although Brazil had the greatest growth rate of enteric methane emissions, it also had the greatest growth rate of beef production, resulting in Brazil having a negative growth rate (–1.82%/year) of methane emissions per unit of product (kilogram of methane/kilogram of beef).en
dc.format.extent46-52-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceCurrículo Lattes-
dc.titleCurrent outlook and future perspectives of beef production in Brazilen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionInstituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE)-
dc.contributor.institutionUnivesidade de São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Melhoramento e Nutrição Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia de Botucatu, Botucatu, Caixa Postal 560, CEP 18618-000, SP, Brasil-
dc.description.affiliationBrazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil 13630-095-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Production, University of São Paulo (USP), Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil 13635-900-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Melhoramento e Nutrição Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia de Botucatu, Botucatu, Caixa Postal 560, CEP 18618-000, SP, Brasil-
dc.identifier.doi10.2527/af.2011-0017-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Frontiers: the review magazine of animal agriculture-
dc.identifier.lattes2307939425313065-
dc.identifier.lattes8030042068164468-
dc.identifier.lattes1068643513710663-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.