You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/137
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDias Filho, Newton L.-
dc.contributor.authordo Carmo, Devaney R.-
dc.contributor.authorRosa, Andre H.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:12:08Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:32:28Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:12:08Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:32:28Z-
dc.date.issued2006-11-12-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2006.06.033-
dc.identifier.citationElectrochimica Acta. Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier B.V., v. 52, n. 3, p. 965-972, 2006.-
dc.identifier.issn0013-4686-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/137-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/137-
dc.description.abstract2-Aminothiazole covalently attached to a silica gel surface was prepared in order to obtain an adsorbent for Hg(II) ions having the following characteristics: good sorption capacity, chemical stability under conditions of use, and, especially, high selectivity. The accumulation voltammetry of mercury(II) was investigated at a carbon paste electrode chemically modified with silica gel functionalized with 2-aminothiazole (SIAMT-CPE). The repetitive cyclic voltammogram of mercury(II) solution in the potential range -0.2 to + 0.6 V versus Ag/AgCl (0.02 mol L-1 KNO3; V = 20 mV s(-1)) show two peaks one at about 0.1 V and other at 0.205 V. The anodic wave peak at 0.205 V is well defined and does not change during the cycles and it was therefore further investigated for analytical purposes using differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry in differents supporting electrolytes. The mercury response was evaluated with respect to pH, electrode composition, preconcentration time, mercury concentration, cleaning solution, possible interferences and other variables. The precision for six determinations (n = 6) of 0.02 and 0.20 mg L-1 Hg(II) was 4.1 and 3.5% (relative standard deviation), respectively. The detection limit was estimated as 0.10 mu g L-1 mercury(II) by means of 3:1 current-to-noise ratio in connection with the optimization of the various parameters involved and using the highest-possible analyser sensitivity. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en
dc.format.extent965-972-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectsilica gel modifiedpt
dc.subjectpreconcentrationpt
dc.subjectheavy metalspt
dc.subjectcarbon paste electrodespt
dc.titleAn electroanalytical application of 2-aminothiazole-modified silica gel after adsorption and separation of Hg(II) from heavy metals in aqueous solutionen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUNESP, Dept Quim & Fis, BR-15385000 Ilha Solteira, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUNESP, Dept Engn Ambiental, BR-18087 Sorocaba, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP, Dept Quim & Fis, BR-15385000 Ilha Solteira, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP, Dept Engn Ambiental, BR-18087 Sorocaba, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.electacta.2006.06.033-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000242616100027-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofElectrochimica Acta-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2042-018Xpt
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.