You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/13973
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPereira, E.-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, H. N.-
dc.contributor.authorEler, J. P.-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, J. A. I. I. de V.-
dc.contributor.authorVan Melis, M. H.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:40:12Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:40:12Z-
dc.date.issued2007-04-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731107392732-
dc.identifier.citationAnimal. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press, v. 1, n. 3, p. 411-418, 2007.-
dc.identifier.issn1751-7311-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/13973-
dc.description.abstractRestricted breeding seasons used in beef cattle produce censored data for reproduction traits measured in regard to these seasons. To analyze these data, adequate methods must be used. The objective of this paper was to compare three approaches aiming to evaluate sexual precocity in Nellore cattle. The final data set contained 6699 records of age at first conception (AFC14) (in days) and of heifer pregnancy (HP14) (binary) obtained from females exposed to the bulls for the first time at about 14 months of age. Records of females that did not calve in the following year after being exposed to a sire were considered censored (77.5% of total). The models used to obtain genetic parameters and expected progeny differences (EPDs) were a Weibull mixed and a censored linear model for AFC14 and threshold model for HP14. The mean heritabilities obtained were 0.76 and 0.44, respectively, for survival and censored linear models (for AFC14), and 0.58 for HP14. Ranking and Pearson correlations varied (in absolute values) from 0.54 to 0.99 (considering different percentages of sires selected), indicating moderate changes in the classification. Considering survival analysis as the best selection criterion (that would result in the best response to selection), it was observed that selection for HP14 would lead to a more significant decrease in selection response if compared with selection for AFC14 analysed by censored linear model, from which results were very similar to the survival analysis.en
dc.format.extent411-418-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherCambridge University Press-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectbeef cattlept
dc.subjectlinear modelspt
dc.subjectprecocitypt
dc.subjectpregnancypt
dc.subjectmesurvival analysispt
dc.titleComparison among three approaches for evaluation of sexual precocity in Nellore cattleen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionSAA SP-
dc.description.affiliationUNESP, FMVZ, Dept Melhoramento & Nutr Anim, BR-18618000 Botucatu, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUSP, FZEA, Dept Ciências Basicas, BR-13635900 Pirassununga, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSAA SP, APTA, IZ, EEZS SP, BR-14460000 Sertaozinho, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP, FMVZ, Dept Melhoramento & Nutr Anim, BR-18618000 Botucatu, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1751731107392732-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000245875000011-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.identifier.fileWOS000245875000011.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.