You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15083
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPellizzer, Eduardo Piza-
dc.contributor.authorFalcon-Antenucci, Rosse Mary-
dc.contributor.authorPerri de Carvalho, Paulo Sergio-
dc.contributor.authorInatomi Kavano Sanchez, Daniela Mayumi-
dc.contributor.authorTozo Rinaldi, Gabriel Augusto-
dc.contributor.authorde Aguirre, Carolina Calles-
dc.contributor.authorGoiato, Marcelo Coelho-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:29:28Z-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:17Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:57:54Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:29:28Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:17Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:57:54Z-
dc.date.issued2011-03-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318207477c-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Craniofacial Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 22, n. 2, p. 434-437, 2011.-
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15083-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15083-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to perform a photoelastic analysis of stress distribution on straight and angulated implants with different crowns (screwed and cemented). Three models were made of photoelastic resin PL-2: model 1: external hexagon implant 3.75 x 10.00 mm at 0 degrees; model 2: external hexagon implant 3.75 x 10.00 mm at 17 degrees; model 3: external hexagon implant 3.75 x 10.00 mm at 30 degrees. Axial and oblique (45 degrees) load (100 N) was applied with a universal testing machine. The photoelastic fringes on the models were recorded with a digital camera and visualized in a graphic software for qualitative analysis. The axial loading generated the same pattern of stress distribution. The highest stresses were concentrated between medium and apical thirds. The oblique loading generated a similar pattern of stress distribution in the models with similar implant angulation; the highest stress was located on the cervical region opposite to implant angulation and on the apical third. It was concluded that the higher the implant angulation, the higher the stress value, independent of crown type. The screwed prostheses exhibited the highest stress concentration. The oblique load generated higher stress value and concentration than the axial load.en
dc.format.extent434-437-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectDental implanten
dc.subjectimplant angulationen
dc.subjectcement retentionen
dc.subjectscrew retentionen
dc.subjectphotoelasticityen
dc.subjectbiomechanicsen
dc.titleInfluence of Implant Angulation With Different Crowns on Stress Distributionen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Dept Surg, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Dept Surg, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0b013e318207477c-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000288535800015-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Craniofacial Surgery-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3800-3050pt
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.