You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15124
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPellizzer, Eduardo Piza-
dc.contributor.authorFalcon-Antenucci, Rosse Mary-
dc.contributor.authorPerri de Carvalho, Paulo Sergio-
dc.contributor.authorSantiago, Joel Ferreira-
dc.contributor.authorDantas de Moraes, Sandra Lucia-
dc.contributor.authorde Carvalho, Bruno Machado-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:29:39Z-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:22Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:57:58Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:29:39Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:22Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:57:58Z-
dc.date.issued2010-01-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00077-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Oral Implantology. Lawrence: Allen Press Inc, v. 36, n. 6, p. 419-424, 2010.-
dc.identifier.issn0160-6972-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15124-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15124-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution of platform switching implants using a photoelastic method. Three models were constructed of the photoelastic resin PL-2, with a single implant and a screw-retained implant-supported prosthesis. These models were Model A, platform 5.0 mm/abutment 4.1 mm; Model B, platform 4.1 mm/abutment 4.1 mm; and Model C, platform 5.00 mm/abutment 5.00 mm. Axial and oblique (45 degrees) loads of 100 N were applied using a Universal Testing Machine (EMIC DL 3000). Images were photographed with a digital camera and visualized with software (AdobePhotoshop) to facilitate the qualitative analysis. The highest stress concentrations were observed at the apical third of the 3 models. With the oblique load, the highest stress concentrations were located at the implant apex, opposite the load application. Stress concentrations decreased in the cervical region of Model A (platform switching), and Models A (platform switching) and C (conventional/wide-diameter) displayed similar stress magnitudes. Finally, Model B (conventional/regular diameter) displayed the highest stress concentrations of the models tested.en
dc.format.extent419-424-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherAllen Press Inc-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectdental implantsen
dc.subjectbiomechanicsen
dc.subjectplatform switchingen
dc.subjectphotoelastic stress analysisen
dc.titlePhotoelastic Analysis of the Influence of Platform Switching on Stress Distribution in Implantsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Dept Integrated Clin & Surg, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Dept Integrated Clin & Surg, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00077-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000285430800002-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Oral Implantology-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.