You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15197
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTabata, Lucas Fernando-
dc.contributor.authorAssunção, Wirley Goncalves-
dc.contributor.authorRicardo Barao, Valentim Adelino-
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Erica Alves-
dc.contributor.authorDelben, Juliana Aparecida-
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Edson Antonio Capello-
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Eduardo Passos-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:10:33Z-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:32Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:58:05Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:10:33Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:32Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:58:05Z-
dc.date.issued2010-05-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181d7f202-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Craniofacial Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 21, n. 3, p. 696-702, 2010.-
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15197-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15197-
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to compare the influence of single-standing or connected implants on stress distribution in bone of mandibular overdentures by means of two-dimensional finite element analysis. Two finite element models were designed using software (ANSYS) for 2 situations: bar-clip (BC) group-model of an edentulous mandible supporting an overdenture over 2 connected implants with BC system, and o'ring (OR) group-model of an edentulous mandible supporting an overdenture over 2 single-standing implants with OR abutments. Axial loads (100 N) were applied on either central (L1) or lateral (L2) regions of the models. Stress distribution was concentrated mostly in the cortical bone surrounding the implants. When comparing the groups, BC (L1, 52.0 MPa and L2, 74.2 MPa) showed lower first principal stress values on supporting tissue than OR (L1, 78.4 MPa and L2, 76.7 MPa). Connected implants with BC attachment were more favorable on stress distribution over peri-implant-supporting tissue for both loading conditions.en
dc.format.extent696-702-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectFinite element analysisen
dc.subjectbiomechanicsen
dc.subjectstress distributionen
dc.subjectdental implanten
dc.subjectattachment systemen
dc.subjectoverdentureen
dc.titleComparison of Single-Standing or Connected Implants on Stress Distribution in Bone of Mandibular Overdentures: A Two-Dimensional Finite Element Analysisen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Bauru Engn Sch, Dept Mech Engn, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Bauru Engn Sch, Dept Mech Engn, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181d7f202-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000278102200016-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Craniofacial Surgery-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record Show full item record   View Statistics
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.