You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15198
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAssunção, Wirley Goncalves-
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Erica Alves-
dc.contributor.authorRicardo Barao, Valentim Adelino-
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Edson Antonio Capello-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:10:32Z-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:32Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:58:05Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:10:32Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:32Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:58:05Z-
dc.date.issued2009-11-01-
dc.identifierhttp://www.quintpub.com/journals/omi/abstract.php?article_id=6855#.Ui9msMbks_Y-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, v. 24, n. 6, p. 1040-1044, 2009.-
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15198-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15198-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of implants with or without threads representation on the outcome of a two-dimensional finite element (FE) analysis. Materials and Methods: Two-dimensional FE models that reproduced a frontal section of edentulous mandibular posterior bone were constructed using a standard crown/implant/screw system representation. To evaluate the effect of implant threads, two models were created: a model in which the implant threads were accurately simulated (precise model) and a model in which implants with a smooth surface (press-fit implant) were used (simplified model). An evaluation was performed on ANSYS software, in which a load of 133 N was applied at a 30-degree angulation and 2 mm off-axis from the long axis of the implant on the models, The Von Mises stresses were measured. Results: The precise model (1.45 MPa) showed higher maximum stress values than the simplified model (1.2 MPa). Whereas in the cortical bone, the stress values differed by about 36% (292.95 MPa for the precise model and 401.14 MPa for the simplified model), in trabecular bone (19.35 MPa and 20.35 MPa, respectively), the stress distribution and stress values were similar. Stress concentrations occurred around the implant neck and the implant apex. Conclusions: Considering implant and cortical bone analysis, remarkable differences in stress values were found between the models. Although the models showed different absolute stress values, the stress distribution was similar. INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS 2009;24:1040-1044en
dc.format.extent1040-1044-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Inc-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectbiomechanicsen
dc.subjectdental implantsen
dc.subjectfinite element analysisen
dc.subjectthreadsen
dc.titleStress Analysis in Simulation Models With or Without Implant Threads Representationen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Aracatuba Dent Sch, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Bauru Engn Sch, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Aracatuba Dent Sch, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Bauru Engn Sch, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000273295800007-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.