You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15207
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAssunção, Wirley Goncalves-
dc.contributor.authorTabata, L. F.-
dc.contributor.authorBarao, Valentim Adelino Ricardo-
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Eduardo Passos-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:29:50Z-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:33Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:58:06Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:29:50Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:33Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:58:06Z-
dc.date.issued2008-10-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01851.x-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Oral Rehabilitation. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, v. 35, n. 10, p. 766-774, 2008.-
dc.identifier.issn0305-182X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15207-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15207-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare the stress distribution induced by posterior functional loads on conventional complete dentures and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems using a two-dimentional Finite Element Analysis (FEA-2D). Three models representative of edentulous mandible were constructed on AutoCAD software; Group A (control), a model of edentulous mandible supporting a complete denture; Group B, a model of edentulous mandible supporting an overdenture over two splinted implants connected with the bar-clip system; Group C, a model of edentuluos mandible supporting an overdenture over two unsplinted impants with the O-ring system. Evaluation was conducted on Ansys software, with a vertical force of 100 N applied on the mandibular left first molar. When the stress was evaluated in supporting tissues, groups B (51.0 MPa) and C (52.6 MPa) demonstrated higher stress values than group A (10.1 MPa). Within the limits of this study, it may be conclued that the use of an attachment system increased stress values; furthermore, the use of splinted implants associated with the bar-clip attachment system favoured a lower stress distribution over the supporting tissue than the unsplinted implants with an O-ring abutment to retain the manibular overdenture.en
dc.format.extent766-774-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectdental implantsen
dc.subjectoverdentureen
dc.subjectattachmenten
dc.subjectfinite element analysisen
dc.subjectbiomechanicsen
dc.titleComparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEAen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Fac Odontol Aracatuba, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Fac Odontol Aracatuba, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01851.x-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000259151400007-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Oral Rehabilitation-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.