You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15215
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAssunção, Wirley Goncalves-
dc.contributor.authorBritto, Rebeca Cavalcante-
dc.contributor.authorRicardo Barao, Valentim Adelino-
dc.contributor.authorDelben, Juliana Aparecida-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Paulo Henrique dos-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:29:51Z-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:35Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:58:07Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:29:51Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:35Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:58:07Z-
dc.date.issued2010-04-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3181cd715f-
dc.identifier.citationImplant Dentistry. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 19, n. 2, p. 167-174, 2010.-
dc.identifier.issn1056-6163-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15215-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15215-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this study was to compare 2 splinted impression transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses.Materials: A metal matrix (control) with 4 implants was used. The implants were positioned at 90, 80, 75, and 65 degrees in relation to the surface of the matrix. Squared impression copings were splinted with self-curing acrylic resin in group 1 (n = 10) and with condensation silicone in group 2 (n = 10). A computer software was used to measure the implants/analogs inclinations. Data were analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance and Tukey test (alpha <0.05).Results: There was significant difference between groups, implant/analog inclinations, and interaction between them (P < 0.05). Group 1 had no significant difference from the control (P > 0.05) nor from group 2 (P > 0.05) regardless implant/analog inclinations. Considering implant/analog inclinations, both techniques did not differ from control group (P > 0.05), except for 75 degrees implant/analog inclinations (P < 0.05).Conclusion: The results suggest that condensation silicone may not be used as an alternative splinting material. Furthermore, implant inclination may affect master cast accuracy. (Implant Dent 2010;19:167-174)en
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)-
dc.format.extent167-174-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectdental implantsen
dc.subjectprosthodonticsen
dc.subjectimpression techniqueen
dc.titleEvaluation of Impression Accuracy for Implant at Various Angulationsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 01/13790-2-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 01/13791-9-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/ID.0b013e3181cd715f-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000276564300011-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofImplant Dentistry-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.