You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15216
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRicardo Barao, Valentim Adelino-
dc.contributor.authorAssunção, Wirley Goncalves-
dc.contributor.authorTabata, Lucas Fernando-
dc.contributor.authorDelben, Juliana Aparecida-
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Erica Alves-
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Edson Antonio Capello-
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Eduardo Passos-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:29:51Z-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:35Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:58:07Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:29:51Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:35Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:58:07Z-
dc.date.issued2009-07-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181abb395-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Craniofacial Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 20, n. 4, p. 1066-1071, 2009.-
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15216-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15216-
dc.description.abstractThis finite element analysis compared stress distribution on complete dentures and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems. Four models of edentulous mandible were constructed: group A (control), complete denture; group B, overdenture retained by 2 splinted implants with bar-clip system; group C, overdenture retained by 2 unsplinted implants with o'ring system; and group D, overdenture retained by 2 splinted implants with bar-clip and 2 distally placed o'ring system. Evaluation was performed on Ansys software, with 100-N vertical load applied on central incisive teeth. The lowest maximum general stress value (in megapascal) was observed in group A (64.305) followed by groups C (119.006), D (258.650), and B (349.873). The same trend occurred it) supporting tissues with the highest stress value for cortical bone. Unsplinted implants associated with the o'ring attachment system showed the lowest maximum stress values among all overdenture groups. Furthermore, o'ring system also improved stress distribution when associated with bar-clip system.en
dc.format.extent1066-1071-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectDental implantsen
dc.subjectcomplete dentureen
dc.subjectoverdentureen
dc.subjectattachmenten
dc.subjectfinite element analysisen
dc.titleFinite Element Analysis to Compare Complete Denture and Implant-Retained Overdentures With Different Attachment Systemsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Bauru Engn Sch, Dept Mech Engn, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Bauru Engn Sch, Dept Mech Engn, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181abb395-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000268400400025-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Craniofacial Surgery-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.