You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15228
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCampos Franca, Diurianne Caroline-
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Alvimar Lima de-
dc.contributor.authorSoubhia, Ana Maria Pires-
dc.contributor.authorTucci, Renata-
dc.contributor.authorCoelho Avila de Aguiar, Sandra Maria Herondina-
dc.contributor.authorGoiato, Marcelo Coelho-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:29:54Z-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:37Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:58:09Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:29:54Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:37Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:58:09Z-
dc.date.issued2011-05-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31820f367b-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Craniofacial Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 22, n. 3, p. 837-840, 2011.-
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15228-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15228-
dc.description.abstractThe failure of facial prostheses is caused by limitations in the properties of existing materials, especially the biocompatibility. This study aimed to evaluate the biocompatibility of maxillofacial silicones in subcutaneous tissue of rats. Thirty Wistar rats received subcutaneous implants of 3 maxillofacial silicone elastomers (LIM 6050, MDX 4-4210, and industrial Silastic 732 RTV). A histomorphometric evaluation was conducted to analyze the biocompatibility of the implants. Eight areas of 60.11 mm(2) from the surgical pieces were analyzed. Mesenchymal cells, eosinophils, and foreign-body giant cells were counted. Data were submitted to analysis of variance and Tukey test. Initially, all implanted materials exhibited an acceptable tissue inflammatory response, with tissue reactions varying from light to moderate. Afterward, a fibrous capsule around the silicone was observed. The silicones used in the current study presented biocompatibility and can be used for implantation in both medical and dental areas. Their prosthetic indication is conditioned to their physical properties. Solid silicone is easier to adapt and does not suffer apparent modifications inside the tissues.en
dc.format.extent837-840-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectFacial siliconeen
dc.subjectconnective tissueen
dc.subjectbiocompatibilityen
dc.subjectinflammationen
dc.titleBiocompatibility Evaluation of 3 Facial Silicone Elastomersen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Pediat Dent, Aracatuba, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Pathol & Clin Propaedeut, Aracatuba, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Inst Hlth Res, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Pediat Dent, Aracatuba, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Pathol & Clin Propaedeut, Aracatuba, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Inst Hlth Res, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0b013e31820f367b-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000290732100016-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Craniofacial Surgery-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3800-3050pt
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.