You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15241
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Paula do Prado-
dc.contributor.authorGoiato, Marcelo Coelho-
dc.contributor.authorPellizzer, Eduardo Piza-
dc.contributor.authorPesqueira, Aldieris Alves-
dc.contributor.authorHaddad, Marcela Filie-
dc.contributor.authorRosifini Alves-Rezende, Maria Cristina-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Daniela Micheline dos-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:29:57Z-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:38Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:58:10Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:29:57Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:38Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:58:10Z-
dc.date.issued2011-03-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182085401-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Craniofacial Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 22, n. 2, p. 523-526, 2011.-
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15241-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15241-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Considering that an increasing number of patients are victims of mutilator surgical resections, these studies are important for treatment success of rehabilitation of patients presenting oronasal communication.Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the stress distribution through photoelasticity in palatal obturator prostheses with different attachment systems for implants.Methods: Two photoelastic models were obtained from an experimental maxillary model presenting an oronasal communication. One model was fabricated without implant, and the other with 2 implants 10 mm in length inserted in the left crest. Four colorless palatal obturator prostheses were fabricated. One prosthesis presented no attachment system, whereas the remaining prostheses were adapted to 3 attachment systems. The assembly was positioned in a circular polariscope for application of axial load.Results: The results were based on photographic records of stress in the photoelastic model submitted to loading. The records revealed higher stress concentration on the bar-clip system followed by the O'ring/bar-clip and O'ring systems, respectively. A homogeneous stress distribution was observed on the photoelastic model with the mucous-supported prosthesis.Conclusions: The attachment systems generated different characteristics of stress distribution that was concentrated surrounding the implants. The bar-clip system exhibited the highest stress concentration on the alveolar crest.en
dc.format.extent523-526-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectPhotoelasticen
dc.subjectimplantsen
dc.subjectobturator prosthesesen
dc.titlePhotoelastic Stress Analysis of Different Attachment Systems on Implant-Retained and Conventional Palatal Obturator Prosthesesen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-16015050 Aracatuba, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-16015050 Aracatuba, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182085401-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000288535800033-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Craniofacial Surgery-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3800-3050pt
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.