You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15272
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorde Almeida, Erika Oliveira-
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Eduardo Passos-
dc.contributor.authorAssunção, Wirley Goncalves-
dc.contributor.authorFreitas Junior, Amilcar Chagas-
dc.contributor.authorAnchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:30:04Z-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:43Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:58:14Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:30:04Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:43Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:58:14Z-
dc.date.issued2011-01-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00656.x-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Prosthodontics-implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry. Malden: Wiley-blackwell, v. 20, n. 1, p. 29-34, 2011.-
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15272-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15272-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate stress distribution in different horizontal mandibular arch formats restored by protocol-type prostheses using three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D-FEA).Materials and Methods: A representative model (M) of a completely edentulous mandible restored with a prefabricated bar using four interforaminal implants was created using SolidWorks 2010 software (Inovart, São Paulo, Brazil) and analyzed by Ansys Workbench 10.0 (Swanson Analysis Inc., Houston, PA) to obtain the stress fields. Three mandibular arch sizes were considered for analysis, regular (M), small (MS), and large (ML). Three unilateral posterior loads (L) (150 N) were used: perpendicular to the prefabricated bar (L1); 30 degrees oblique in a buccolingual direction (L2); 30 degrees oblique in a lingual-buccal direction (L3). The maximum and minimum principal stresses (sigma(max), sigma(min)), the equivalent von Mises (sigma(vM)), and the maximum principal strain (sigma(max)) were obtained for type I (M. I) and type II (M. II) cortical bones.Results: Tensile stress was more evident than compression stress in type I and II bone; however, type II bone showed lower stress values. The L2 condition showed highest values for all parameters (sigma(vM), sigma(max), sigma(min), epsilon(max)). The sigma(vM) was highest for the large and small mandibular arches.Conclusion: The large arch model had a higher influence on sigma(max) values than did the other formats, mainly for type I bone. Vertical and buccolingual loads showed considerable influence on both sigma(max) and sigma(min) stresses.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)-
dc.format.extent29-34-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectStress distributionen
dc.subjectfinite-element analysisen
dc.subjectbiomechanicsen
dc.subjectendosseous dental implantationen
dc.subjectosseointegrationen
dc.subjectcomputational analysisen
dc.titleCortical Bone Stress Distribution in Mandibles with Different Configurations Restored with Prefabricated Bar-Prosthesis Protocol: A Three-Dimensional Finite-Element Analysisen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Aracatuba Sch Dent, BR-16015050 Aracatuba, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Aracatuba Sch Dent, BR-16015050 Aracatuba, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 08/00209-9-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00656.x-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000290145900005-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthodontics-implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.